Baise: A ban on genetically engineered crops?

Resize text          Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Gary BaiseGary H. Baise Despite a quarter century of promises, agricultural biotechnology has yet to provide any concrete advancements towards reducing world hunger, ameliorating global malnutrition, combating…, creating miracle drugs through GE [genetically engineered] plants or animals, or climate change." (WRONG!)

On February 25, 2014, this statement was made by the Center for Food Safety, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Beyond Pesticides, and Center for Biological Diversity in a petition filed with the Secretary of Interior that seeks to ban genetically engineered crops from being used on National Wildlife Refuges.

These anti-agriculture nongovernmental groups, as usual, do a terrific job in putting their case into context. Their petition against the use of GE crops shows the legal authority to ban GE crops, examples of GE crop bans in numerous towns in the United States and in other countries.

The NGOs' claim that GE crops are being unlawfully grown on National Wildlife Refuges across the nation and that GE crops pose "significant threats" to NWRs.

If these groups are successful in banning GE crops grown on NWRs, it will not be long before the same claims are made against farmers who use GE seeds everywhere else.  

The NGOs' 61-page petition is a blueprint for attempting to destroy the use of genetically engineered seeds and crops. The petition also requests Fish and Wildlife Services to prohibit the use of neonicotinoids. (I will write a separate piece on the banning of neonicotinoids later.)

The NGOs ignore overwhelming proof of GE crop benefits. They do not acknowledge the U.K.'s Secretary of State for the Environment and Rural Affairs, Owen Patterson, who says that nongovernmental organizations such as the Center for Food Safety are "casting a dark shadow over attempts to feed the world."

He says of such groups, "It's just disgusting that little children are allowed to go blind and die because of a hang-up by a small number of people about this technology."

Patterson adds, "If there ever was a clear-cut cause for outrage it is the concerted campaign by…nongovernmental organizations as well as by individuals against golden rice." You'll recall that golden rice is a genetically engineered rice seed that boosts vitamin A.

The British Environment Minister has gone so far as to say that public interest groups opposing GE crops such as golden rice are "wicked".

Notwithstanding this strong condemnation, NGOs are asking the Department of Interior and FWS to declare that farming with GE crops is not a compatible use for refuge lands.

The petition seeks a banning of such crops and seeds from being used on NWRs, and a monitoring program where FWS conducts field surveys of areas where GE crops are planted. It seeks to have FWS provide the public with information regarding location of GE crops, acreage planted, the type of crop, whether it is roundup ready or BT and the types of pesticides and herbicides that are used, including the dates and amounts of application.

Finally, the NGOs want FWS to conduct field surveys in 2014, 2015 and 2016 to find GE plants that germinate in the fields and remove and destroy any such plants.

The petition is a wake-up call for American agriculture.

The Center for Food Safety, the lead NGO, claims it has 400,000 members nationwide, and that it was successful as a plaintiff in halting the planting of GE crops on the Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge where CFS used the National Environmental Policy Act to stop the planting of GE crops. CFS claims its lawsuit halted the use of GE crop planting in 12 states in the Northeast.

CFS claims its members grow organic seed crops and consumes products made with non-GE materials and without pesticides.  CFS also claims its members "…regularly eat organic foods and desire foods that are free of GE material and chemical pesticides."

The petition claims there are threats associated with the use of GE crops such as "transgenic contamination," "creation of herbicide resistant superweeds," and an increase in the use of pesticides.

The NGO petition filed last week demonstrates what the U.K. Secretary of the Environment is saying.  NGOs opposed to the development of GE crops are, as he says, "politically motivated" and if GE technology is blocked, it will cause the United Kingdom to become "a museum of farming."

These words should ring as a warning to those working in agriculture in the United States.

View All Blogs »


Comments (6) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Marvin    
March, 06, 2014 at 08:36 AM

Not many of you are old enough to remember when we went from open pollinated corn to the new hybrids. There were the same ignorant groups opposing that. If they want to live in the dark ages, let them. We have only quadrupled the yield since then, and kept their stomachs full.MNS

Marvin    
March, 06, 2014 at 08:37 AM

Not many of you are old enough to remember when we went from open pollinated corn to the new hybrids. There were the same ignorant groups opposing that. If they want to live in the dark ages, let them. We have only quadrupled the yield since then, and kept their stomachs full.MNS

michael    
Kansas  |  March, 06, 2014 at 11:52 AM

Call them out for what they are, in terms they invented - SCIENCE DENIERS & 1ST WORLD 1% ELITISTS. They deny the overwhelming and universal scientific evidence that GMOs are safe for consumption and the environment, and deny poor, starving 3rd world children the highly nutritious and highly efficient crops they so desperately need and want. In addition, they are driving up the cost of food for our own poor and disadvantaged at home. Early skeptics and dedicated environmentalists, even a founder of Greenpeace, have declared their continued opposition to be wrong and nothing short of genocidal. They've arrogantly forced their personal "feelings", "beliefs" and wealth-based entitlement on the world by means of massive spending on deceitful propaganda, lobbyists and underhanded political deal-making. They need to be stopped, not just lamented.

Sam    
March, 06, 2014 at 04:21 PM

How did we ever get by without GMO and chemicals??? MASSIVE CROP FAILURES right?

Marvin    
IA  |  March, 07, 2014 at 08:27 AM

Hey Sam, try to figure out how you will keep your belly full without.MNS

Mark    
IL  |  March, 07, 2014 at 10:21 AM

Just think, What would be the price of food if there was no biotech crops ! 30 times higher what they are now. Wrong ! Much higher than that. More like 300 times the price. A 10 % reduction & crops went from $4.80 to $8.00 corn. $10.80 soybeans to $18.00+ . All you need to do is go to Japan. Food lines for meat is more than 30 meters long. Africa would suffer the most. There would be no food exported to that country. There would be riots in this country over food, OH I forgot we already do. People want the farmers to look like they did in 1930-1940's So they can be laughed at.


644K Hybrid Wheel Loader

The 229 hp 644K Hybrid Wheel Loader from John Deere utilizes two sources of energy: diesel and electric. The machine’s ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

)
Feedback Form
Leads to Insight