Cutting feed and reproduction costs

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

New strategies to reduce the cost of production include more efficient nutrient use by the animals and improvements in their lifetime production efficiency. Instead of feeding more to pregnant and lactating cows that need additional nutrients during this period, Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists are trying to make the cows more efficient so they'll need less feed.

Beef producers spend a large portion of their budget on feed, which represents 50-55% of the total costs of developing replacement heifers. Animal scientist Andrew Roberts, geneticist Michael MacNeil and their colleagues at the ARS Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory (LARRL) in Miles City, Mont., have found that reducing the amount of feed given to heifers can result in more efficient use of nutrients for growth and reproduction.

Researchers studied two lifetime treatment groups composed of hybrid heifers that were 50% Red Angus, 25% Charolais and 25% Tarentaise. A control group was fed according to traditional industry recommendations, and a restricted group was fed 80% of feed consumed by their counterparts (calculated on a common body weight basis) for 140 days.

Heifers receiving less feed also gained weight more efficiently throughout the postweaning period and the following grazing season. The actual amount of feed provided to restricted heifers over the entire feeding period, which ended when animals were 1 year old, was about 73% of that given to the control group.

Strategy reduces replacement costs
Using this strategy to provide less feed might reduce costs of producing each pregnant replacement heifer by more than $31, Roberts says. The practice could also extend the animal's life, with important implications for lifetime efficiency and profitability. 

In the experiment, restricted heifers had a final pregnancy rate of 87% and the control heifers had a 91% pregnancy rate, MacNeil says.

 

"Our results indicate that restricting feed is a matter of economics for farmers," he says. "We have also found that other strategies, such as crossbreeding and providing early calving assistance, can increase rebreeding performance of young cows."

Increasing efficiency through feed-restricted diets
Heifers were managed as one group from breeding through late fall, and pregnant animals were again separated into two groups—restricted feed and control—each winter. During winter months, restricted cows were fed 20% less supplemental feed than the control group.

Eventually, less-efficient heifers failed to reproduce and were culled if they were on a restricted diet. Increasing their feed would keep the cows in production but cost more for the producer, Roberts says. Inefficient breeders could be eliminated early to be harvested for high-quality meat.

Researchers found that restricting feed of heifers might improve their efficiency throughout their lives. They also noticed interesting traits in second and third generations produced from cows in the restricted feed study, which began in 2001. "The feed restriction seems to have made the second generation of calves able to withstand restriction with greater efficiency," Roberts says.

While third-generation feed-restricted calves were lighter at birth and at weaning than calves from cows fed at the industry standard, feed-restricted animals themselves were slightly fatter and heavier at the calves' weaning, he adds. "Physiologically, the second-generation restricted cow is conserving some of the nutrients taken in for body reserves, which may result in more efficient reproduction and better survivability in the herd," Roberts says.

“This is important because it potentially positions the heifers to withstand subsequent periods of nutrient deprivation due to naturally occurring phenomena such as drought," MacNeil says.

 

Tracking marbling traits for high-quality beef
To improve the quality of beef, LARRL scientists are taking a closer look at the streaks of fat in lean meat, known as marbling—a longtime indicator of palatability and basis for determining the price of beef. Marbling, which is measured either at slaughter or by ultrasound of live animals, is an inherited trait and thus amenable to genetic improvement, MacNeil says. "Cattle breeders would benefit greatly from having genetic indicators of superb marbling and other sought-after traits," he says.

Geneticist Lee Alexander and his colleagues are studying these genetic traits. They used a panel of molecular genetic markers to locate specific locations in the genome of a Wagyu-Limousin cross population that contain genes that influence traits such as marbling and fatty acid composition. Those breeds were specifically chosen because Wagyu is a heavily marbled beef, and Limousin is leaner.

"Genetic markers successfully identified a region of the genome associated with the amount of marbling and relative quantities of saturated and monounsaturated fats," Alexander says.

Scientists believe these findings may lead to healthier and better-tasting products for consumers through breeding methods that result in an improved fat profile in beef.

For more information about ARS research on beef production, contact Mark Boggess, leader of ARS National Program #101: Food Animal Production.



Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left


644K Hybrid Wheel Loader

The 229 hp 644K Hybrid Wheel Loader from John Deere utilizes two sources of energy: diesel and electric. The machine’s ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

)
Feedback Form
Leads to Insight