$103M to expand broadband Internet in rural U.S.

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Telecommunications companies in 16 states will share more than $103 million in federal funding to help expand broadband Internet access to those areas of rural America that haven't been reached by the high-speed service or are underserved, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced Monday.

Policymakers, public interest groups and telecom companies are seeking to bridge the digital divide by reaching even the most remote pockets of the U.S. with broadband internet, hoping to improve economic and educational opportunities there.

"There's a big gap that remains between rural and urban areas because it's just hard to make a business case in rural areas," said Jonathan Adelstein, the agriculture department's rural utilities service administrator, in a conference call with reporters. "Rural areas' future depends upon access to broadband and we're not where we need to be today."

The states that will benefit from the funding are: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

As many as one in 10 Americans can't get Internet connections fast enough to engage in such common online activities as watching video or teleconferencing, and two thirds of schools have broadband connections that are too slow to meet their needs, the Commerce Department reported earlier this year.

Last year, the Federal Communications Commission released a national broadband plan that set a goal of hooking up 100 million U.S. households to broadband connections of 100 megabits per second by 2020. That's at least 20 times faster than many existing home connections.

About 28 percent of rural America, or nearly 19 million people, lack access to Internet with speeds of three megabits per second or faster, compared with only 3 percent, or 7.2 million people, in non-rural areas, according to an FCC report titled "Bringing Broadband to Rural America."

Adelstein said rural areas lag behind the urban areas of the country when it comes to broadband Internet access because the more remote areas don't have enough people, have rugged terrain, or it's too costly for companies to serve them.

One of the grants announced Monday will help provide Internet services to about 570 members of the Karuk Native American Tribe in a mountainous region of Orleans, in northern California.

"It is a remarkably remote place. It's one of the darkest places from space in the lower 48" states, said Craig Tucker, a spokesman for the tribe.

Tucker said lack of reliable Internet services is a "limiting factor for economic development" for the tribe and the non-Native community that lives in the area as well.

"There's not really good cell phone service, or Internet service. Even electricity is a struggle/ A lot of people are off the grid entirely," he said.

Another grant will help rebuild the broadband infrastructure in Tushka, Okla., which was hit by a tornado in April that killed two people and destroyed or damaged numerous buildings in the community.

Adlestein said there's still a "long way to go" in terms of bringing rural America in line with the rest of the country, and he added that one of the challenges is that young people won't stay in communities without broadband Internet access.

"There's not a future there for them," he said. "Not only do they expect it, but they need it ... if young people want to stay rural areas where they grew up."

The majority of the funding comes in the form of infrastructure loans of totaling about $90 million for five broadband projects. These projects join others across the countries that are sharing $192 million in loans announced by the Agriculture Department in late July.

About $13 million of the funding is through the USDA's Community Connect program, which provides grants to rural, economically challenged communities. The funds can be used to build, buy or lease facilities to bring broadband access to community facilities such as schools and government offices, as well as residents and businesses.

The USDA funding is just one of several federal, state and local programs working to expand Internet access to rural parts of the country.

Comments (4) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Tennessee  |  August, 23, 2011 at 07:36 AM

It is NOT the government's responsibilty to provide internet access to ANYONE. If people really need it, they can get it for themselves. What a crock.

Florida  |  August, 23, 2011 at 08:23 AM

this is not that different from the telephone expansion & rural electrification projects of decades ago. High-speed Internet is as vital for the future of rural communites today as the telephone was when it first rolled out. Try doing any significant work or take an online class using dial-up or DSL.

Belton MO(KC area)  |  August, 23, 2011 at 10:18 AM

Just 103 million? Cass County Missouri is getting $21 million of it(the County has to put up an additional 6-7 mill). I was late to the party, but railed at the County Commission budget meeting this winter at how this is such a boondoggle.....why would we, in essence, provide a private company with the means with which to provide a service which we do not need, and have no demand for. Our Commissioners sojourned to DC a couple years back to belly up to the trough(I'd suppose on our local dime) and returned all abuzz with how it'll bring biz to the area, blah, blah, blah. I was even told by a Commissioner how my broadband bill would GO DOWN once this network was in place. Believe me when I tell you, I laughed him out of the room. It has now come to light that this has resulted in corruption at the local level, no-bid contracts being given and extension after extension, without documentation. It'll now go to the State Auditor, I believe. Did I mention all the County officials involved are/were Democrats?

North Georgia  |  August, 24, 2011 at 08:14 PM

How much do you want to bet that the minuscule amount of $103 mil. reported to be the total swells to at least 10 times that amount? How many government programs meet even the CBO's estimate? Off the top of my head I would say none meet their initial funding limit. The government will wake up in a year or four and act surprised. We can only hope to elect someone other than Obama next fall that will cut the sustained budget requirements and refuse to spend money we don't have. Excuse me, I meant to say we can only hope to elect many new conservatives to both the House, Senate, and especially the Presidency. If I had to choose two out of three, then Obama would stay but with the restraints placed on him by that 2/3 of our government would hobble him and make him crazy. Dreams, they are good to have.

5E Series

Introduced in 2013, the new 85 and 100 hp John Deere 5085E and 5100E feature 4-cylinder Interim Tier 4 emissions-compliant ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight