Book values don’t cut it when formulating rations

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Editor's note: The following article appeared in the July 2014 issue of Dairy Herd Management.

Cows crave consistency in routine and nutrition. The most successful rations are mixed and fed properly and consistent in nutrient value and quality, enhancing feed intake and maximizing cow health and productivity. However, consistency can be difficult when you consider feedstuff nutrient values — like protein, fiber and starch levels — are not consistent from load to load. The goal gets even murkier if you do not work with the right data to make ration decisions.

1) Nutritional variation is common

The same variation found in forages occurs within many other commodity feeds like soybean meal, dried distillers grains, cottonseed and beet pulp. As a result, it’s common practice to simply follow supplier guarantees for many of these ingredients.

However, assuming these values are accurate means you may be overestimating or underestimating the nutrient value of half your ration, since rations are commonly split 50/50 between forages and commodity ingredients. That assumption can lead to unnecessarily high feed cost and/or undesirable animal performance.

“What if the ingredient contributed 100 more grams of metabolizable protein than a book value projected?” asked John Goeser, director of nutrition, research and innovation at Rock River Laboratory, Inc. “That knowledge of that difference can mean the ability to shave from 7 to 15 cents off your ration cost.”

Differences in field conditions, varieties, harvesting and processing make it unrealistic to expect commodity byproduct feed ingredients to remain constant. Still, it’s common to treat them as though their nutrient composition is unchanging when formulating rations.

“Variability is real,” said Goeser. “Not many will argue that it’s not. But we haven’t always had practical ways to measure the nutritive value of commodity feed ingredients.”

2) Book values are a best-guess

It’s tempting to use book values to account for ingredient nutrient values. But, while a good resource, some of the values in the National Research Council (NRC) database may be based on a small sample size. Or, the data used for the library may not be accurate for your region.

3) Variation among feedstuffs is significant

The compelling reasons to monitor and account for feed ingredient variation continue to add up. For instance, data presented by Goeser and his colleagues at the 2013 American Dairy Science Annual Meeting showed significant differences in rumen dry matter digestibility, bypass protein and substantial variation within feeds for soybean meal, canola meal, corn distillers grain, corn gluten, soy hulls and expeller meal.

“Concentrate feed fiber variation is just one parameter that’s not generally accounted for in dairy rations,” explained Goeser. “Fiber, protein and starch levels are three parameters that you really need to monitor to increase ration consistency and accuracy.”

A 2012 study at Ohio State University (OSU) illustrated that the variation in NDF among commodity feed ingredients was similar to the NDF variation found in forages. Assuming a 20% inclusion rate and average within-farm variation for concentrate NDF, diet NDF could change by 0.3 to 0.8 percentage units.

4) Inaccuracies impact animal performance

It’s tough for the rumen to adapt to feed ingredient variation resulting in sub-optimal performance.

For example, OSU research conducted last year showed dairy cows fed a diet containing either 7% long-chain fatty acids or 4.8% long-chain fatty acids produced less milk and had lower dry matter intake than cows fed diets with less variation.

5) There are options to deal with variation

While variation will always occur in forages and commodity feeds, you have options to deal with it.

The inclusion of less variable feed ingredients is one area to explore. For example, you can select an ingredient with a consistent level of dietary protein, and then deal with variability for other ration nutrients. At least you can be confident in ration protein.

Another suggestion is to adopt a routine commodity testing program, similar to a testing program for your forages. While commodity feeds are not on hand as long as forages, you can compare nutrient composition of a current sample to that of the previous two truckloads to get a sense of the variability for which you must account in formulating diets.

To learn more about managing your ration to minimize variability and achieve consistent performance, visit www.transition.ahdairy.com/.

 

click image to zoomDr. Pankowski Dr. Joel Pankowski is Manager, Field Technical Services, Arm & Hammer Animal Nutrition.



Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left


Mycogen® brand Silage-Specific™ Corn Hybrids

No other company has more experience with silage than Mycogen Seeds. Mycogen® brand TMF corn silage hybrids are bred specifically ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

)
Feedback Form
Leads to Insight