Raw milk linked to most dairy-related disease outbreaks

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

The rate of outbreaks caused by raw, unpasteurized milk and products made from it was 150 times greater than outbreaks linked to pasteurized milk, according to a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The 13-year review also revealed that the states where the sale of raw milk was legal had more than twice the rate of outbreaks as states where it was illegal.

The study, published Feb. 21 in the CDC journal Emerging Infectious Diseases, reviewed dairy product outbreaks from 1993 to 2006 in all 50 states. The authors compared the amount of milk produced in the U.S. during the study period (about 2.7 trillion pounds) to the amount that CDC estimates was likely consumed raw (1 percent or 27 billion pounds). They determined the rate for disease outbreaks caused by raw milk products.  Raw milk products include cheese and yogurt.

The study included 121 dairy–related disease outbreaks, which caused 4,413 illnesses, 239 hospitalizations and three deaths. In 60 percent of the outbreaks (73 outbreaks), state health officials determined raw milk products were the cause.

Nearly all of the hospitalizations (200 of 239) were in those sickened in the raw milk outbreaks. 

These dairy-related outbreaks occurred in 30 states, and 75 percent (55 outbreaks) of the raw milk outbreaks occurred in the 21 states where it was legal to sell raw milk products at the time. The study also reported that seven states changed their laws during the study period. 

Consumers can’t tell if raw milk is safe to drink by looking at, smelling, or tasting it. Even under ideal conditions of cleanliness, collecting milk introduces some bacteria.  Unless the milk is pasteurized, these bacteria can multiply and grow in the milk and cause illness. Pasteurization involves heating milk to kill disease-causing bacteria.

Robert Tauxe, M.D., M.P.H., deputy director of CDC’s Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases (DFWED), point to the connection between state laws and outbreak frequencies.

“This study shows an association between state laws and the number of outbreaks and illnesses from raw milk products,” Tauxe said in a news release.  “Restricting the sale of raw milk products is likely to reduce the number of outbreaks and can help keep people healthier. The states that allow sale of raw milk will probably continue to see outbreaks in the future.”

The study also found that the raw milk product outbreaks led to much more severe illnesses, and disproportionately affected people under age 20. In the raw milk outbreaks with known age breakdowns, 60 percent of patients were younger than age 20, compared to 23 percent in outbreaks from pasteurized products. Children are more likely than adults to get seriously ill from the bacteria in raw milk.

For study co-author Barbara Mahon, M.D., M.P.H., deputy chief of CDC’s DFWED Enteric Diseases Epidemiology Branch, the evidence clearly shows that the health benefits propagated by raw milk advocates are outweighed by the risk of related illnesses.

“While some people think that raw milk has more health benefits than pasteurized milk, this study shows that raw milk has great risks, especially for children, who experience more severe illnesses if they get sick,” Mahon said.  “Parents who have lived through the experience of watching their child fight for their life after drinking raw milk now say that it’s just not worth the risk.”

Among other key findings:

  • Thirteen percent of patients in raw milk outbreaks were hospitalized compared to 1 percent in pasteurized milk outbreaks. This may be because raw milk outbreaks were all caused by bacteria, such as E. coli O157, which tend to produce more severe illnesses, according to the study.
  • Pasteurized milk and cheese outbreaks were often caused by relatively mild infections like norovirus and Staphylococcus aureus.

To view the study, please visit www.cdc.gov/eid. For more information about raw milk, visit http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/rawmilk/raw-milk-index.html.

 

Related articles


Prev 1 2 Next All



Comments (4) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Constitution    
united states  |  February, 21, 2012 at 08:45 PM

Raw milk is very healthy and it is a total lie that people get ill from it. Its a shame we are not all drinking it. Raw milk is very good and very healthy for you but the FDA does not want you to be healthy. After drinking raw milk for months, I cannot stand the taste of store milk. You can really tell the difference. The Govt does not want you healthy and smart

gvdocbob    
Illinois  |  February, 22, 2012 at 11:13 AM

A total lie that people get sick from it??? So when we see 70+ people get sick just this month, and all of them drank raw milk from the same place, that is all a big lie??? I guess all these families, hospitals, and doctors just made it all up, right? Just a big conspiracy to get raw milk removed, so the CDC got hundreds of people involved in this plot to make it look bad...yeah, right. Look, if you want your raw milk, drink it. But quit professing to the world that it is safe! It has inherent dangers that will never allow it to be considered safe.

Robert    
NY  |  February, 22, 2012 at 08:41 AM

That means if 1 person got sick from pasturized then 2.5 got sick from raw. And just because someone says the milk was the cause does not mean it was so.

ssm    
new york  |  February, 22, 2012 at 02:42 PM

Yes, you can tell the difference between raw milk & store milk, kind-of like you can tell the difference between raw potatoes & boiled potatoes. There IS a difference. However, most people are not able to see bacteria, whether they be on your hands or in your food. I am a dairy veterinarian and recently had a cow abort due to a listeria infection. Thankfully, this farm does not sell raw milk. If they did, there would likely be a lot of sick people, as the listeria could have been shed in this cow's milk. Listeria can cause serious disease in humans as well as animals. I know from first hand experience with a family member who lost a late term pregnancy due to this bacteria. Pasteurization was implemented years ago to reduce diseases in humans, and it has been very successful in that endeavor. If you personally want to drink raw milk, by all means go ahead. BUT, do not get upset, file a complaint or lawsuit if you should ever get sick from it. There are many well known risks from consuming raw dairy products. I encourage my clients to drink pasteurized milk, and many of them do so.


348 Square Baler

A faster plungerhead (93 strokes per minute) and a heavy-duty bale case with adjustable side doors makes this the ideal ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight