For study co-author Barbara Mahon, M.D., M.P.H., deputy chief of CDC’s DFWED Enteric Diseases Epidemiology Branch, the evidence clearly shows that the health benefits propagated by raw milk advocates are outweighed by the risk of related illnesses.
“While some people think that raw milk has more health benefits than pasteurized milk, this study shows that raw milk has great risks, especially for children, who experience more severe illnesses if they get sick,” Mahon said. “Parents who have lived through the experience of watching their child fight for their life after drinking raw milk now say that it’s just not worth the risk.”
Among other key findings:
- Thirteen percent of patients in raw milk outbreaks were hospitalized compared to 1 percent in pasteurized milk outbreaks. This may be because raw milk outbreaks were all caused by bacteria, such as E. coli O157, which tend to produce more severe illnesses, according to the study.
- Pasteurized milk and cheese outbreaks were often caused by relatively mild infections like norovirus and Staphylococcus aureus.
To view the study, please visit www.cdc.gov/eid. For more information about raw milk, visit http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/rawmilk/raw-milk-index.html.
- More confirmed cases in Pa. campylobacteriosis outbreak
- Dairy farmer loses battle in raw milk case
- Kentucky bill would allow herd-sharing for raw milk products
- Raw milk: passion or confusion?
- Lawsuit filed in raw milk case
- Rutgers profs at odds over raw milk
- Raw milk especially dangerous to some
- California raw milk linked to E. coli, production stalled
- Food safety and raw milk
- NMPF urges FDA to defend laws against raw milk sales
- Raw milk tops list of foods to avoid