Demand shocks help drive food, commodity prices

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

A new report from Purdue University researchers and Farm Foundation, NFP shows emerging trends that make this year’s dramatic increase in food and commodity prices different from the increases seen in 2008. But like in 2008, there is no single or simple cause, with numerous domestic and international factors contributing.

Two “demand shocks” – corn used for ethanol and China’s imports of soybeans – play key roles in this year’s market trends, according to the report, titled “What’s driving food prices in 2011?”

Farm Foundation, NFP commissioned Purdue economists to prepare the report, which follows similar analysis they conducted in 2008 and 2009. The authors identified five key factors in shaping today’s price story:

Persistent demand shocks: The report specifically cites demands of the biofuels industry, particularly for corn, and China’s decision to import huge quantities of soybeans due to income growth and stocks-building. The report notes that food, seed and industrial (FSI) use of corn has expanded rapidly in the past five to seven years. Since the 2005-2006 marketing year, 88 percent of the growth in total world corn use has been in the FSI category, where ethanol production is placed. As for soybeans, since 2005-2006, annual Chinese soybean purchases have more than doubled, representing more than 90 percent of the increase in world imports.

Inelasticity of supply and demand: A reduction in the responsiveness of demand and supply to changes in price influences today’s markets. The report notes for example that in the United States, with limited suitable land available for expanded crop production, farmers reallocate acreage from one crop to another based on demand, while globally, 70 percent of expanded acres used to grow high demand crops  was new land brought into production. Our current energy policy also creates inelasticity in that Renewable Fuel Standards would support demand for corn for ethanol even if fuel prices dropped.

Weather and effects on grain stocks: Weather is a bigger issue in 2011 than in 2008, the report notes. Corn stocks were drawn down when U.S. yields dropped in 2010. The researchers say tight world stocks for corn and soybeans cannot be overcome in one year of normal yields. High prices will exist for two crop years or longer, before moderating to levels lower than 2011 peaks but still higher than historic norms.

Chinese Policies: China has been a major holder of agricultural commodities but the stocks-to-use ratio of each commodity has varied considerably over the past decade. The policy to accumulate substantial soybeans stocks through imports is one example of the impact on world markets.

Macroeconomics: A weaker U.S. dollar contributed to a commodity boom between 2002 and 2008. Today, changes are not as dramatic, but the dollar exchange rate remains weak and volatile.

Read more from the Farm Foundation, including links to the full report and the 2008 and 2009 versions.

Comments (4) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Texas  |  July, 21, 2011 at 10:15 AM

Very clear! We're in trouble. Thank you Obama. Thank you EPA. Thank you Guitner.

Wisconsin  |  July, 27, 2011 at 07:18 PM

Considering this issue has been developing over the last decade (and even earlier), it would be fair to thank Bush and his administration as well.

Peter Sandfort    
Ames, Iowa  |  July, 21, 2011 at 10:15 AM

The fact that the most significant increase in the cost of producing corn is high oil prices seems to get lost in the rush to blame all of the corn price increase on ethanol. Oil is unlikely to become cheap again, so the cost to produce corn is unlikely to become as low as historical prices. In the longer term, corn yields inexorably increase so there will be enough corn and, in fact, corn will again become surplus in not to many years. As usual, government policy was not perfect, but the mandate to use ethanol will be seen as a wise decision in the future. American politics are grossly short sighted as the current budget problem indicates. Our gasoline prices should have risen (via tax) as in Europe for decades; that is why Europeans consume half as much fuel per person as we do. Our national priorities have been bent to the desires of Big Oil and Big Auto for too long. There is no food for fuel dilemma - higher prices are the solution to higher prices. As in 2009 when commodity prices dramatically dropped after 2008 peaks, commodity prices will again drop. Poor starving nations will grow more of their own food as their inept governments are influenced or forced to address their neglected agricultural sector. The concept of a Northern Hemisphere obligation to forever feed the Southern Hemisphere is absurd. Considering good land and optimum climate available in the Southern Hemisphere, they should be feeding us.

Gold Silver Tips    
indore  |  July, 22, 2011 at 10:09 PM

I really appreciate your post and you explain each and every point very well.Thanks for sharing this information.And I’ll love to read your next post too. Regards Gold Silver Tips

Massey Ferguson 5600 Series

Our most advanced multi-tasking mid-range ever. Perfect for livestock, dairy, hay, and general all-around farm work, these exceptional loader tractors ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight