Farm policy specialist calls farm bill split a “very bad idea”

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article
The audio player requires a newer version of Flash to play this clip. Please update your version of Flash by clicking below.
Get Adobe Flash player
The audio player requires a newer version of Flash to play this clip. Please update your version of Flash by clicking below.
Get Adobe Flash player

After the defeat of the farm bill last month, many are beginning to wonder what will happen next.

The farm bill in effect expires in September, giving lawmakers some time to consider a repackaging of the bill. Some believe splitting the farm bill’s two main provisions—assistance for farmers and food stamps—into two, separate bills is the best solution for getting the bill to pass through both the Senate and the House.

In an interview, Mary Kay Thatcher, American Farm Bureau Federation’s policy specialist, argues that splitting the farm bill would make it more difficult for the bill to pass in the House.

“You’re looking at 435 members in the House, 25 percent of whom have zero farmers in their district. How does one go to the Hill and convince one of those members of Congress to support spending money for agriculture?”

The farm bill needs 218 votes to pass in the House. By alienating those who would support the bill for only its non-agricultural provisions, the chances of passing this bill are greatly reduced. A unified bill dissatisfies both political parties, but it contains provisions that both parties want to pass.

Thatcher explained, “We’re adamantly opposed to [a split bill] approach and, in fact, spearheaded a letter with the Farmers’ Union last week where 532 agriculture, crop insurance, conservation, research groups said, ‘Very bad idea.’”

As the expiration date of the current farm bill approaches, a new compromise between the parties is becoming necessary.

Read more here.



Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Craig A. Moore    
Billings, MT  |  July, 11, 2013 at 05:44 PM

I think what the government is really concerned about is the public reaction if SNAP was no longer part of the farm bill. Everyone is misinformed as they hate the idea the farm bill is at 100 billion a year, seems like a really big hand-out to the farmers. If food snaps were no longer in the farm bill and farm bill dropped to 20 billion a year people might view it differently.


5E Series

Introduced in 2013, the new 85 and 100 hp John Deere 5085E and 5100E feature 4-cylinder Interim Tier 4 emissions-compliant ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

)
Feedback Form
Leads to Insight