HSUS livestock-handling petition disputed

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

In comments filed recently with USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, the American Meat Institute detailed the strong economic benefits that support humane livestock handling and said that FSIS should reject two petitions filed by the Humane Society of the United States and Farm Sanctuary, which suggest that no such incentives exist.

“Their key argument is completely nonsensical,” says Mark Dopp, AMI senior vice president of regulatory affairs/general counsel.

FSIS asked for public comment on the petitions, as well as on the agency’s clarifications for rules regarding non-ambulatory animals, in the Feb. 7 Federal Register

Of particular concern to the dairy industry, the HSUS petition seeks immediate euthanization of veal calves that cannot walk when they arrive at federally inspected plants. The petition seeks to prohibit the common practice of warming veal calves to permit them time to rest and become ambulatory. FSIS indicated that it is inclined to grant this petition.  

The Farm Sanctuary petition seeks immediate euthanization of any livestock arriving at plants that are non-ambulatory for any reason.

In both petitions, the petitioners argued that when livestock are unable to walk, an incentive exists for plant personnel to abuse the animals and force them to walk. AMI’s comments deconstructed that argument by showing the strong incentives that exist to ensure an animal’s welfare, both in terms of the quality benefits and in terms of the costs attendant to lost production time when regulatory actions are taken in response to inhumane treatment of livestock.

AMI also noted that granting the Farm Sanctuary petition, in particular, would  impede disease surveillance and could cause confusion if, for example, a non-ambulatory hog that is simply tired and refusing to rise becomes ambulatory before a veterinarian arrives to check it.   

“Absent an FSIS dictate that all animals be held for ante-mortem inspection, many non-ambulatory animals would be euthanized and disposed of before being examined for disease.  Ironically, many animals, especially in the case of hogs, in the time it can take for the federal veterinarian to arrive to conduct such an inspection likely would become ambulatory, thereby creating a quandary regarding the status of such animals when subject to ante-mortem inspection,” according to the AMI filing.  “That is, would livestock in such circumstances still be subject to condemnation even if found not to be diseased?  If so, why and if not, why should they be treated differently from animals that are non-ambulatory, are subjected to inspection, and also found to be disease free?”

In conclusion, AMI said that granting the petitions would result in unnecessary waste with no identifiable benefit.  

“If a non-ambulatory pig or veal calf could become ambulatory with rest or warming, if they can be handled in a way to minimize discomfort, if economic incentives exist to promote good care, and if these animals can pass ante-mortem inspection, is it really appropriate, ethically, morally, and otherwise, to turn livestock that have the potential to nourish people into little more than a waste disposal problem?  In destroying these livestock, a farmer’s livelihood is also harmed dramatically,” AMI says.  “The only beneficiaries under this scenario are the petitioners, who will be able to claim ‘victory’ to their constituents, a collection of persons whose underlying purpose is to oppose animal agriculture and meat consumption.”

Dopp says that while the official public comment period is technically closed, it’s not too late for concerned famers to contact the agency with additional comments.

“It’s almost impossible to say when FSIS will make their final decision on these requirements,” he concludes.


Prev 1 2 Next All



Comments (2) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Rosemary Marshall    
UK  |  April, 19, 2011 at 01:32 PM

"many non-ambulatory animals would be euthanised and disposed of before being examined for diseae." Says it all really. Are there that many cases like this arriving at the abattoir? Points to very poor animal welfare.

Mark Weathers    
NC  |  April, 20, 2011 at 04:20 PM

I am sure that FSIS realizes that HSUS and their owned company Farm Santuary is simply a social movement based on philosophies and not on science, it is a movement based on morals and tied to the deep green movement in many ways and their philosphies of doom and gloom and the end of the earth. Isn't the "father" of the animal rights movement, Peter Singer, now saying that children 2 or under with poor quality of life should be euthanized. Gosh! I may add that neither the ecologist movement of the animal rights movement seems to care too much about people. The more animals they feel can remove from human hands for food or use the better. There are many reasons why animals are down and none of it has to do with bonafied illness. FSIS really should circumvent the BS of a social movement based on pushed morals of one group of people with not even 500,000 members and stick to what science says is the correct response to any downed animal.


Grand L60 Series

Kubota’s Grand L60 Series combines a higher level of luxury with outstanding productivity never before seen in this class of ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

)
Feedback Form
Leads to Insight