This week an Obama administration official criticized a U.S. Senate panel for voting to block the Pentagon from buying more costly alternative fuels, saying a military biofuels program announced last year could help revitalize rural America.
The Senate Armed Services Committee voted last week to block the Pentagon from using 2013 funding to buy alternative fuels that are more expensive than conventional fuels. Another amendment, also approved as part of a $631.4 billion defense bill, would prevent the Defense Department from building a biofuels refining facility unless required by law.
U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said senators on the panel "may not fully understand" a partnership between the Agriculture Department, the Energy Department and the U.S. Navy aimed at encouraging the development of biofuels.
The Navy wants to use next-generation fuels made from wood chips, inedible parts of plants and other sources to reduce its use of fossil fuels imported from other countries.
"It's beyond me why we wouldn't help this industry that will create higher farm income, more jobs in rural America, reduce the costs for consumers, satisfy commercial airlines ... and make our military less reliant on a foreign supply of energy," Vilsack said during a conference call with reporters.
"It is just astounding that people don't understand that."
Vilsack made the comments during a conference call with Adam Monroe, president of biotechnology company Novozymes North America, to urge Congress to extend several tax credits for clean-energy companies.
Boosting renewable fuels and creating "green jobs" has been a priority for President Barack Obama, a Democrat, and is a talking point for his campaign for re-election in November.
Monroe said Novozymes took advantage of government support to open a new plant in Nebraska that will create 100 new jobs.
Critics have argued that the next generation of biofuels is not yet commercially feasible, that using corn to make ethanol drives up corn prices, and that the government is unfairly picking winners and losers in energy markets. Republicans have made this criticism part of their election-year attacks on Obama.
Vilsack told reporters the partnership with the Navy is crucial to ramp up production of alternative fuels and bring the cost down to a level more attractive to other consumers.