How many of your corn acres this year are planted to Bt varieties designed to control insects that might decrease your potential yield? Last year the national average was 63%, and for many Cornbelt farmers the percentage is going to be every acre but the refuge. For some farmers it will be all of their acres. But the question arises whether you are trying to control yield robbing insects, or increasing your yield, since you heard that Bt varieties have a higher yield. You might answer “both,” so let’s find out what is motivating your neighbors.
Bt genetics were initially introduced 15 years ago to help control European corn borer, and have done a pretty good job. ECB has certainly dropped into the level of minor pests, except in refuge fields where the scouting process has overlooked corn borers. In 2000 Bt accounted for 19% of planted acres and in 2003, Bt seed was introduced to control corn rootworm as well. Economists from USDA’s Economics Research Service report it is hard to estimate the true costs and benefits of Bt corn because of “weather, infestation levels and seed costs, along with conservation tillage, crop rotation, and other pest-management practices.”
On the whole studies have found that Bt corn yields are higher for Bt adopters than for corn growers depending on conventional varieties. A myriad of studies have gauged the difference anywhere from 7.1 bushels per acre to 18.2 bushels per acre. Parallel studies have found that Bt users used less insecticide than non-Bt adopters. While that may seem to be obvious, the economists said all of those studies occurred from 1996 to 2001 and motivations for use may have changed over time. So they base a new study on data collected in 2005.
After interviewing 1,156 corn growers in 19 major corn growing states, half of whom were in the Cornbelt, 76.5% reported they used Bt corn to increase yields. 11.3% used Bt corn to reduce their pesticide costs, and 3.3% did it to save on management time. 10% had “other” reasons. The latest survey indicated that actual Bt yields were 17 bushels more, seed use was just slightly higher, insecticide active ingredient use was 43% lower, and profits were $18.84 higher per acre for Bt users. The primary decline in insecticide use was for the primary formulas for corn rootworm.
While those statistics may be meaningful, the economists say the survey did not find out whether the data came from farmers who where Bt users or non-users based on their management ability, instead of a random phone call. Their concern stemmed from the knowledge that large operations are more likely than small operations to adopt agricultural innovations, and that farmers using crop insurance are more likely to use Bt seed than those without crop insurance. And they knew that farmers expecting yield losses from corn borers were more likely to plant Bt hybrids than those not expecting yield losses. While adopters of new technology are usually more experienced, Bt adopters were an average 4 years younger than non-Bt users.