NMPF and IDFA criticize New Jersey raw milk bill, urge Governor to oppose it

 Resize text        

WASHINGTON, DC – The leading national trade organizations representing dairy producers and processors today sent a letter to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, urging him to oppose legislation in the state senate that would allow the direct sale of raw milk to the public.

In the letter from the dairy associations, which was also sent to State Senate Democratic Majority Leader Stephen Sweeney, the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) and the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) said that the food safety risks inherent in raw milk will increase the incidence of foodborne illness and reverse public heath improvements in New Jersey.

“The link between raw milk and foodborne illness has been well-documented in the scientific literature, with evidence spanning nearly 100 years. Raw milk is a key vehicle in the transmission of human pathogens, including E. coli O157:H7, Campylobacter, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella,” the letter said. A copy of the letter can be found at www.nmpf.org, and www.idfa.org.

The joint letter pointed out that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control reports that “nearly 90% of raw milk-associated outbreaks have occurred in states where sale of raw milk was legal. Legalizing the sale of raw milk in New Jersey increases the risk to public health, opening up the State’s consumers to the inevitable consequence of falling victim to a foodborne illness.”

Federal law prohibits the interstate sale of raw milk, but allows states individual discretion to regulate raw milk sales within their borders. Several states in recent years have considered expanding the sale of raw milk, even as the product has been repeatedly linked to serious illnesses from coast to coast. The bill in New Jersey’s statehouse is Assembly Bill No. 743.

“America’s dairy farmers and processors have worked hard to ensure that they produce a safe, wholesome product, and a key pillar in the steps the industry takes is pasteurization,” Connie Tipton, President and CEO of IDFA, referring to the heat treatment that milk receives to eliminate pathogens from the dairy supply.

NMPF’s Kozak, whose professional career started in Trenton when he worked for the State Department of Health, wrote in the letter that “it is disappointing to see that the public health gains we achieved in New Jersey in the 1970s would be compromised today by a conscious effort to allow the sale of potentially pathogenic foods. This is an affront to all those working to protect public health.”

Both Tipton and Kozak said there was no valid reason to liberalize sales of raw milk, asserting that “there is absolutely no science behind the claims of raw milk supporters that pasteurization does anything other than make safer a potentially hazardous product.”

The National Milk Producers Federation, based in Arlington, VA, develops and carries out policies that advance the well being of dairy producers and the cooperatives they own. The members of NMPF’s 31 cooperatives produce the majority of the U.S. milk supply, making NMPF the voice of more than 40,000 dairy producers on Capitol Hill and with government agencies. Visit www.nmpf.org for more information.

The International Dairy Foods Association, Washington, DC, represents the nation's dairy manufacturing and marketing industries and their suppliers, with a membership of 550 companies representing a $110-billion a year industry. IDFA is composed of three constituent organizations: the Milk Industry Foundation (MIF), the National Cheese Institute (NCI), and the International Ice Cream Association (IICA). IDFA's 220 dairy processing members run more than 600 plant operations, and range from large multi-national organizations to single-plant companies. Together they represent more than 85% of the milk, cultured products, cheese and frozen desserts produced and marketed in the United States. IDFA can be found online at www.idfa.org.


Sponsored Links


Comments (5) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

mark    
Fresno CA  |  April, 05, 2011 at 10:54 AM

Processors dislike any mention of direct raw milk sales....because of the obvious. Processors do not get to take the nutrition or profit out of it.

In CA I produce organic raw milk and serve 400 stores and 50,000 people per week with raw unprocessed raw milk. There is no lactose intolerance with raw milk and it is fantastic for asthma. Conversely, pasteurized milk is listed as the most allergenic food in America for kids and 25-35% of the population has some form of lactose intolerance or allergy to processed dead milk....

Perhaps your objections are not based in safety or true science, but simple market protection.

Raw milk is not easy and takes good standards and a responsible dairyman. But it also makes that farmer $150 per CWT and gives him the connection and love of his consumer, somthing missing when that same farmer gets $16 per CWT from a precessor and is near bankrupcy.

We need more farmers to produce raw milk in America. Do not listen to the FDA, NCIMS or dairy processors or look to them for leadership in this effort. Look to the consumers and do you own research.

Breast milk is raw milk and kids thrive on it....it is the processed dead milk that kids can not drink.

Kids thrive on raw milk. They need the good bacteria, good fats and active enzymes.

Mark McAfee
Founder OPDC
Fresno CA

Joseph Heckman, Ph.D.    
Monroe, New Jersey  |  April, 05, 2011 at 06:34 PM

Your position shows a lack of scientific integrity and balance. You fail to acknowledge that pasteurized milk is linked to foodborne illness and it is well-documented in the scientific literature. To give just one example: Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes Infections Associated with Pasteurized Milk from a Local Dairy – Massachusetts, 2007 In all, five cases were identified, and three deaths occurred. This outbreak illustrates the potential for contamination of fluid milk products after pasteurization and the difficulty in detecting outbreaks of L. monocytogenes infections.
http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/301/8/820.extract

alyssa Pellicano    
citrus heights ca 95610  |  April, 06, 2011 at 01:06 AM

sorry for the interruption from my posting...but I was saying that Mark McAfee among other ecological farmers are truly heroes and make no mistake that our hero farmers in the USA can feed this country nutrient dense, fresh, high quality, non GMO, organic, pesticide/herbicide free food...if only they are allowed to do so!
Alyssa

Pam Schoenfeld    
Randolph, NJ  |  April, 06, 2011 at 01:01 PM

I appreciate Big Dairy’s concern for their profits, albeit cloaked in their purported concern for our health and welfare here in New Jersey. However as Dr. Heckman points out, mandatory pasteurization is not the solution, as it has been responsible for widespread outbreaks of food borne infections as documented in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The production of clean raw milk by dedicated farmers such as Mark McAfee’s Organic Pastures Dairy in California is a viable option, and one that is being embraced by more and more consumers like me every day. Know your farmer, know your food means more to us than just a marketing phrase tossed around by the USDA. It is our way of life.

I would like to remind the reader that leafy greens, eggs, tuna, and oysters headed up the list of foods that were responsible for the most food-borne illness outbreaks between 1990 and 2006 according to the FDA (data compiled by the Center for Science in the Public Interest). Would you prefer to eat your salad pasteurized or irradiated, as ordered by the government to ensure his safety? Should the government prohibit the sale of raw tuna for sushi, or only allow the sale of pasteurized eggs or irradiated oysters? That is what we are headed for if we allow the government to decide in what form we can eat our foods. I for one, intend to stand up for my right to choose the foods I believe nourish me and my family, as I have little faith in the government’s concern for our health and welfare.

Thomas Jefferson said it best: “If people let the government decide what foods they eat and medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as souls under tyranny.”

Blair McMorran    
Westminster, CO  |  April, 06, 2011 at 02:36 PM

"This is an affront to all those working to protect public health.” And since the 70's, all those working to protect public health have done such a stellar job, haven't they? Obesity, diabetes and heart disease trends are steadily going up. We now have superbugs that we can't stop. It's time to try something different. It's time to remove barriers to small farms. This bill would help.

Big Dairy knows they can't raise dairy herds like small sustainable farmers do. Raw milk intended for human consumption is a completely different food than raw milk intended for pasteurization. The (small) herds are pastured and have access to sunshine and fresh air. They are given biologically appropriate feed, which makes their milk nourishing. Farmers avoid the use of hormones, GMO feed, pesticides, antibiotics, etc. Their teats are individually hand-washed, dried and sanitized. They are treated humanely, and trust their caretakers. They are calmer, happier animals. The milk is fresh, wholesome, rich and delicious.

In contrast, milk intended for pasteurization is um, different. The average life-span of a factory farm dairy cow is 42 months. The average life-span of a small pasture-based dairy cow is 10-12 years. Which milk would you choose?

That is, if you had a choice....which is all we're asking for. Freedom of choice.


Feedback Form
Leads to Insight