NFU: Obama’s budget proposal shortchanges agriculture

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

National Farmers Union (NFU) President Roger Johnson issued the following statement in regard to President Barack Obama’s proposed budget that was released on Feb. 14:
 
“NFU members understand the importance of balancing the federal budget and reducing the federal deficit. Agriculture and the farm safety net were already cut by $4 billion in 2010 as a result of the Standard Reinsurance Agreement for federal crop insurance programs. NFU will oppose any budget reductions to agriculture programs that are deeper than cuts to other departments.
 
“The budget document released by the Office of Management and Budget asserted that farming has been highly profitable in the last decade. However, wild swings in commodity prices have made the last ten years among the most volatile on record for farmers. Government intervention was required to assist several sectors of agriculture, such as dairy and swine, to survive times of low prices and high input costs in just the past several years.
 
“More importantly, NFU believes that farm policy should be designed to provide support during difficult times. Recent high market prices may lead some to believe that commodity prices will continue long into the future. That conclusion is likely to be very wrong. Every farmer understands that high prices are followed by low prices – and our policies need to recognize that.
 
“We are encouraged that the president’s budget supports opportunities for investment in USDA and the Department of Energy. This spending will help to create job opportunities and economic development for our rural communities.
 
“The administration’s proposed budget makes significant cuts to rural development programs, which were identified as a key component of a vibrant rural America during the presidential elections of 2008. Cuts were also announced for agricultural research efforts and the Commodity Credit Corporation. Removing these dollars from the baseline for the next farm bill will make the legislation even more difficult to write. Investments in a stable and secure food, fiber and energy supply ought to be of the utmost importance because these investments create a thriving rural economy and are critically important to our national security.
 
“NFU will continue to work on behalf of farmers, ranchers, fishermen, and rural Americans as the budget process moves forward.”



Comments (5) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

David Kross    
Earlville, NY  |  February, 17, 2011 at 09:28 AM

Why is it that farmers, most of whom consider themselves conservatives and capitalists, keep insisting on direct payments even in times of very high feed grain prices, and want to see ethanol subsidies continue, even though in this time of short food supply and high world food prices, fuel from food flies in the face of common sense? I keep seeing the farm publications saying we will need to feed many more people in the next decades. Feed them ethanol? When the mining of P for fertilizer plays out later in this century our grandkids will look back and wonder what the heck we were thinking of, using it up on food for fuel.

David Kross    
Earlville, NY  |  February, 17, 2011 at 09:28 AM

Why is it that farmers, most of whom consider themselves conservatives and capitalists, keep insisting on direct payments even in times of very high feed grain prices, and want to see ethanol subsidies continue, even though in this time of short food supply and high world food prices, fuel from food flies in the face of common sense? I keep seeing the farm publications saying we will need to feed many more people in the next decades. Feed them ethanol? When the mining of P for fertilizer plays out later in this century our grandkids will look back and wonder what the heck we were thinking of, using it up on food for fuel.

Gary Frank    
Wisconsin  |  February, 17, 2011 at 10:34 AM

David Kross is right on with his comments. Farmers need to get off the government payroll and ethanol was a mistake.

Gary Frank    
Wisconsin  |  February, 17, 2011 at 10:34 AM

David Kross is right on with his comments. Farmers need to get off the government payroll and ethanol was a mistake.

Steve    
WI  |  February, 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM

All farmers need to get weaned off of government programs. When the government creates one program it always distorts something else. Farmers can farm without the government but the government cannot govern with hungry people. The american farmer produces the most economicaly priced safest food supply in the world.


5M Series

Five M Series Models: 5065M, 5075M, 5085M, 5100M, and 5115M (65-115 hp). If you spend a lot of time on ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

)
Feedback Form
Leads to Insight