Bill would keep farmers' private information private

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

A bipartisan group of lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives is determined to make sure the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not disclose private information of U.S. farmers and ranchers as it did in early 2013. Congressman Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), joined by Representatives Jim Costa (D-Calif.), Lee Terry (R-Neb.) and Mike McIntyre (D-N.C.), introduced the Farmer Identity Protection Act that would prohibit EPA from releasing agricultural producers’ private information into the public domain.

Dairy farm In 2012, EPA proposed a rule under the Clean Water Act that would have resulted in the agency gathering private information of livestock producers and making it publicly available and searchable through its website. USDA, the Department of Homeland Security, lawmakers in both the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate, and agricultural organizations raised concern that the proposal was not only an overreach of EPA’s authority but also would make it easier for activist organizations to target farming and ranching operations and could potentially threaten the safety and security of the nation’s food supply.

While EPA ultimately withdrew the proposal, the agency still collected private information of more than 80,000 livestock operations in 30 states through state environmental agencies and released it through Freedom of Information Act requests. Information, including name, address, phone number and even GPS coordinates of agricultural operations, was disclosed to Earth Justice, the Pew Charitable Trust and the Natural Resources Defense Council. Congressman Crawford recently called this an egregious breach of privacy.

“This legislation would prevent that from happening, making sure that sensitive information, private, personal information is not disclosed,” Rep. Crawford said. “We need to be diligent from a national security perspective that we’re protecting the food supply, the food chain and also protecting producers.”

Agricultural organizations including American Farm Bureau Federation, National Pork Producers Council, Dairylea Cooperative, Inc., National Turkey Federation, National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, St. Albans Cooperative Creamer, Inc., National Chicken Council, and Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc., sent a letter to Congress supporting the Farmer Identity Protection Act.

Environmental groups, however, disagree with Rep. Crawford’s efforts to keep this information private. According to a Jan. 24, 2014, article appearing in Roll Call, Tarah Heinzen, an attorney with the Environmental Integrity Project, was quoted saying, “While industry describes this case as a fight to protect ‘personal information’ from the prying eyes of environmentalists, the fact is that these highly polluting animal factories are corporate operations that are destroying waterways and communities wherever they operate.”

Despite opposition from environmental organizations, Rep. Crawford says he is confident the bipartisan legislation will have enough support to move through the House, but says the Senate might be more challenging. He encouraged farmers and ranchers to reach out to their lawmakers and urge them to support the bill. The legislation was introduced on March 6 and was referred to the committees on Energy and Commerce, Transportation, Agriculture, and Science, Space and Technology.

Comments (2) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

smokey brown    
in.  |  March, 13, 2014 at 11:17 AM

I fail to see the diffrence between a farmers info and anybody elses being released.

USA  |  March, 17, 2014 at 01:53 AM

They only care about privacy so their slaughterhouses can continue abusing animals freely and pollute the environment undetected. All companies have their information published. You can find them all on Manta. The shroud of secrecy they want to give their pet industries is downright scary. Notice how FOI is morphing into "Freedom Of Information the Government Decides You Can Have" Act. They will stop at nothing to keep citizens in the dark. I say we change the symbols of the political parties from the Donkey and Elephant and replace them with a swastika and a pentagram.

Farmall® 100A Series

From field to feedlot, you need a tractor that can multi-task as well as you do. Case IH Farmall™ 100A ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight