Editor's note: The following commentary was written by Suzie Wilde, the wife of a Texas family farmer and originally posted on the Texas Agriculture Talks website.
I kiss a family farmer.
Some of the land he farms has been in his family for almost 100 years. He does all the work himself at this point in his farming career, except for harvest time when two or three other folks have to help. Often those are even all family members, including his town-dwelling wife, at times. (I can pack a pretty tight module, if I do say so myself.) But lately I have come to realize that many of those out there who are critics of farming think that the farmer I kiss should not be allowed to be called a family farmer.
They think that he has too much land, too many tractors, a barn that is too big… They contend that he is “big ag” or “corporate farming.”
This leads me to look for a definition of any family business. There is a family here in town who owns my three favorite Mexican restaurants.
Because they own three restaurants, does that disqualify them from being a family business? Are you only allowed to own one restaurant to be a family business? Can that family hire employees to bus tables or do only family members have to bus tables? If the farmer I kiss only owned one tractor, would the critics then let him be called a family farmer?
Sounds a bit bizarre when you put it in these terms, but often bizarre ideas are quicker to float around the social media world than truths and facts.
I recently saw a comment on a blog post which reflected the opinion that most farmland is being farmed by corporations. I cited the EPA’s numbers that show 98 percent of farmers are family farmers.
The commenter promptly said that may be so, but those 98 percent only farm 2 percent of the land. He had no information to cite for his numbers, which is pretty common on the Internet. Just make something up and throw it out there.
Other facts from USDA show that his comment is completely incorrect.
I have been around farmers and farming since the day I was born. I have yet to personally know some huge, faceless corporation that farms. Where are they? Who are they? So I started looking at all the farmers I know more closely.
I do, in fact, know some corporate farmers. I won’t use names, because it’s just plain rude to start talking about folks on the Internet without their permission. But, for example, let’s take a dad and his two sons who farm about 2,500 acres with lots of tractors and plows. They have their operation set up as an LLC, a limited liability corporation. This makes very good business sense, and it provides some protection of their home and personal assets from lawsuits against the LLC. Now, the dad and his sons do 98 percent of all the work. They drive all the tractors, plant all the crops, harvest all the acres (except maybe an extra person or two to build modules at harvest, which most likely is a nephew or the farmer wife they kiss.) But, since the dad and the two sons operate under “Dad & Sons Farms, LLC,” do they no longer get to be considered family farmers? Are they now a huge, faceless corporation? No.
Comments (3) Leave a comment