D.C. Watch: Last chance for 2012 Farm Bill

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Congress will probably pass a one-year extension of the 2008 Farm Bill, according to Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa. Congress reconvenes this week, but the House will only be in session for 8 days in September and the Senate will be in session for 12 days. Grassley says bluntly, not much is going to get done before the election.

If Congress doesn’t pass the farm bill before the end of the year, the process has to start over when the new Congress is sworn in. Grassley says that it will be more difficult to pass a farm bill next year because Congress will be working with more stringent budget guidelines. Not everyone is as anxious as farmers are to get a new farm bill in place.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (food stamps) does not expire at the end of September. If a new farm bill is passed, funding for this and other nutrition programs will be reduced. So there is a disincentive for nutrition program advocates to push for a new farm bill. To a certain extent, the same is true of conservation programs. Most of the conservation programs are funded through 2014. With Congress facing some much bigger issues than the farm bill, and a sizable share of farm bill stakeholders not pushing for passage of the new legislation, the chances that the farm bill will be passed before the end of the year are declining.

The National Corn Growers Association (NCGA) is asking the EPA to extend the comment period for the waiver of the Renewable Fuels Standard mandate. The comment period, which officially began August 30 and runs through September, conflicts with harvest for much of the farm sector. Because of that, Garry Niemeyer NCGA President says the comment period may not give farmers the chance to participate in this important policy decision.

NCGA is asking EPA to keep the comment period open for 60 days, instead of the 30 days currently planned. House members may introduce legislation to adjust the federal ethanol mandate if EPA does not grant the waiver requests that have been submitted says House Agriculture Committee Vice Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA). Goodlatte says he hopes EPA will signal its intent to waive the mandate by the end of September. With the comment period running at least through the end of September, there is little chance EPA will indicate what action they will take on the waiver requests by the end of this month. Passing legislation would almost certainly drag on well into next year so even if Congress were to pass such a bill, there would be no impact anytime soon.

Argentina has lodged a formal complaint with the World Trade Organization contending that U.S. imports on Argentine beef violate world trade rules. Argentina has filed a request for consultations with the U.S. If no agreement is reached in 60 days, the country can request a dispute settlement panel. U.S. imports of beef from Argentina have been suspended since 2001 when there was an outbreak of foot and mouth disease in that country. Argentina says the ban is no longer needed because the country has been certified as free of the disease since 2007.

Obstacles to U.S. agriculture exports may increase next month. Labor negotiations between east and gulf coast dockworkers and shippers broke down last week and the union is threatening to strike as early as October. The union handles ports from Maine to Texas and the current contract expires September 30. There could also be problems along the west coast. It appears likely that ports will lock-out members of the union when the contract expires at the end of September. The combination of labor troubles, low water in major rivers and high prices may all contribute to reducing U.S. agricultural exports during the coming months.

Comments (5) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Lincoln, NE  |  September, 09, 2012 at 03:19 PM

The farm bill should be dead in the water until the Ethanol Mandate is lowered permanently, allowed to react to market reality, which means to allow cheaper ethanol imports or be repealed. The USDA just reported that in 2011 hunger rose in the U.S. while the economy continued to be in the tank. Burning corn in a famine is an obscenity. Even using the leftover grain from distilling is "VooDoo Economics". DDG is a further net loser to the feed lots. It is much more cost effective to just feed the corn to the livestock, like we have done for hundreds of years. Chickens don't eat DDG, they eat cracked corn, hogs eat anything. Cattle eat DDG, and other supplements. DDG just further perpetuates a flawed market concept. I also mention the billions of gallons of precious water used (wasted) during a drought to first grow excess corn, then to process the corn to ethanol. You do not mention the cost of drying to grain for transport. The END RESULT is this. If corn is to expensive for feeders to buy on the open market, THEN even the most inexperienced economist will tell you that DDG is also to expensive to buy on the open market. The "Ethanol Mandate" a solution looking for a problem.

September, 10, 2012 at 11:19 AM

Want to pass the farm bill? Sign the petition! Want to prevent the farm bill? Voice your opinion! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTudILWFj94

September, 10, 2012 at 11:19 AM

Want to pass the farm bill? Sign the petition! Want to prevent the farm bill? Voice your opinion! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTudILWFj94

CO  |  September, 10, 2012 at 11:47 AM

The Farm Bill should not contain items for welfare, energy, broadband, housing, etc. and everything should stand on its own in any future bills to better control costs and eliminate the special interests and self-serving items being added. Farmers should not have their needs controlled by Food Stamps or other items and battles regarding help for a separate entity. A Farm Bill should be based upon Farmers needs or merits and nothing else. All items should be stand alone bills to be properly managed in the future. A prime example of accommodating self-serving entities is the Senate Bill in this section: SEC. 12211. DEFINITION OF RURAL AREA FOR PURPOSES OF THE HOUSING ACT OF 1949 would increase the pool of recipients and also increased rural community population requirement to 35,000. This population level would be a small City not a true rural community. This means less money available to true rural area communities, because others would continue receiving more after they are now self-sufficient and no longer rural. With only X amount of dollars available the Senate wants to add more communities with their hands out looking for more. The Senate would be adding to our country’s problem instead of politely informing those areas that they have already received their share and it is now other smaller communities turn to receive those benefits. That is the purpose of rural programs to help very small struggling communities grow and become self-sufficient, not to become a Welfare System for self-sufficient communities who have already received their fair share. Farm Bill is antiquated with too much past garbage and needs to die!!!

Texas  |  September, 11, 2012 at 09:50 PM

The fact that "snap" has to be used in place of food stamps, and welfare is in a farm bill shows just how warped and political the "farm bill?" is, or is not an Ag bill at all, with all the "cotton candy" it includes. No one, no one! addresses the millions in lost equity by family animal Ag families since the onset of the EPA controlled ethanol mandate and it's complete energy inefficiency and waste. It must be an election year!

6D Series

John Deere offers four models in its economical 6D Series Tractor lineup: the 105 horsepower 6105D, 115 horsepower 6115D; 130 ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight