New report affirms dairy animal well-being

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Overall, farms participating in the National Dairy FARM Animal Care Program are doing a thorough job of adhering to comprehensive animal well-being guidelines.

Since enrollment began in September 2010, the FARM Animal Care Program has been implemented on dairy farms accounting for 41 percent of the nation’s milk supply. With continued expansion of enrollment, participation in the FARM program is anticipated to exceed 70 percent of the nation’s milk supply in 2013, the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) said today.

Participating producers are provided comprehensive training materials and undergo an on-farm evaluation conducted by a trained veterinarian, extension educator, co-op field staff member, or other FARM-trained professional. Evaluators then provide a status report and, if necessary, recommendations for on-farm improvement.

In June 2012, data collected from the more than 5,000 second-party evaluations made of the dairy operations enrolled in FARM program was reviewed and analyzed to determine the effectiveness of on-farm implementation. A summary of those results was made available today.

“While we’re seeing near nearly universal adoption of the best practices from the FARM animal care manual,” said Jamie Jonker, Vice President of Scientific and Regulatory Affairs at NMPF, “some specific practices have not achieved the same level of adoption as others. This demonstrates the importance of continuous improvement and on-going education as advocated by the program.”

Jonker cited several examples of where adherence is greatest, as well as where improvements are needed:

  • 99.2% of farm operators engage in dairy animal observations to identify any potential health issues;
  • 99% of farm operators train personnel to handle and restrain calves with a minimum of stress to the animal;
  • 95.5% of farm operators train personnel in proper methods to move non-ambulatory animals;


  • 72.7% of farm operators have emergency plans to address animal care needs stemming from unique circumstances such as a natural disaster;
  • 68% of farm operators apply antiseptic to the navels of calves after birth as a preventative health measure.

To protect the integrity and credibility of the program, the FARM program utilizes an independent third-party process to ensure that its practices are being appropriately adopted and the educational materials and methodologies used in training both farm operators and evaluators is sound and effective. Each year, a nationwide sample of dairy farms in the program is randomly selected for visits from third-party “verifiers” to assure (to a 95% confidence interval) that the observations recorded during the second-party evaluations are valid. Validus, an Iowa-based certified auditing company with more than 10 years of experience with farm animal care programs, is used to conduct the third-party verification process.

The initial third-party verification of the FARM program was conducted in 2011, with analysis of that process completed earlier this year. This analysis confirmed that effective implementation of the FARM program is occurring through producer education and on-farm evaluation. The objective third-party verification for 2012 is currently underway.

 “This ‘check the checkers’ analysis compares the data collected from the second-party, on-farm evaluations with the third-party, on-farm verification data. This assures that the on-farm evaluations are being consistently conducted across all dairy farm participants,” Jonker added. “The findings of the third-party verification confirm the validity and integrity of the FARM program.”



Prev 1 2 Next All

Comments (2) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

October, 25, 2012 at 01:13 PM

Not that I disagree with what the objectives of this program are, but what I dont agree with are that as our milk processors dont get a premium for those that can meet these most basic forms of this program, so it looks to me that by allowing our processors to utilize this program without compensation for our efforts is only allowing them to further reduce the value added portion of what happens to the producer side of the pay price. Furthermore I have never heard of any producer not being able to meet this programs requirments, so what does that say, either all producers are doing a good job at animal care, or that this program is so simple in design that it shows that even the most inept producers can succeed. So is NMPF picking "winners", or are they contiuing there support for the processors over producers once again.

October, 25, 2012 at 09:21 PM

Where is the premium coming from? The program is voluntarily, most producer don’t care if somebody enters their farms for the Farm Program. Producers take pride in their work and the care of their animals. What do they need to hide?

8560 4WD Shuttle

Built for Performance. Modern looking 83 hp workhorse with rugged, cast-iron chassis that provides more weight – resulting in more ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight