Vermont Senate passes GMO labeling bill

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

The Vermont Senate voted to pass a new law requiring labeling for foods that contain  ingredients produced with genetic engineering or genetically modified ingredients (GMOs). If enacted, the law would be the first in the nation to require GMO labeling without any contingencies or similar legislation by adjoining states. The proposed effective date is July 1, 2016.

Although the Vermont House previously passed the bill, it will be returned for representatives to approve changes made by the Senate. Once approved, the bill will reach the governor’s office for signature into law.

It is estimated that 80% of all food sold in the United States is at least partially produced from genetic engineering. The bill would require labeling on all such food sold at retail in Vermont, regardless of whether the food was manufactured in Vermont.

While the bill exempts processing aids and milk from cows that have been fed GMO feed, many dairy products and other foods that incorporate milk would be affected unless they were made with organic ingredients. 

The Food and Drug Administration, the American Medical Association, the World Health Organization, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Academy of Sciences all have said that GMO ingredients are safe and there are no negative health effects associated with their use.

“This bill would confuse consumers, raise food prices and do nothing to ensure product safety,” said Ruth Saunders, IDFA vice president of policy and legislative affairs. “It’s too bad for the dairy industry that Vermont would require such labels on chocolate milk, yogurt and other healthy dairy products while offering an exemption to the entire alcoholic beverage sector.”

The neighboring states of Connecticut and Maine already passed labeling laws, but each delayed implementation until at least four other adjoining states passed and implemented similar laws. This strategy is designed to protect them from lawsuits from companies and associations that want to safeguard consistency in food labeling and avoid a 50-state patchwork of laws. Vermont, however, has decided to go it alone and is preparing a war chest in anticipation of the lawsuits to come.

IDFA and many other trade organizations oppose individual state legislation on GMO labeling and fully support The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2014, introduced by U.S. Reps. Mike Pompeo (R-KS) and G.K. Butterfield (D-NC). This bill would preempt states from requiring mandatory labeling and establish a federal standard for voluntary labeling of food and beverage products made with GMOs.

“IDFA believes that a federal solution on GMO labeling would bolster consumer confidence in American food by affirming FDA’s overall authority for setting the nation’s food safety and labeling regulations,” said Saunders.

IDFA is working with the Safe and Affordable Food Coalition, headed by the Grocery Manufacturers Association, on all issues related to GMO labeling.



Comments (5) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Joe Dairyman    
USA  |  April, 18, 2014 at 06:13 PM

This very stupid and unfortunate that the leaders in that state are are caving in to GMO labeling. The organic people want this so that they have a reason to sell more of their high priced food. Organic is not sustainable. The only way farmers can feed the increasing population and produce enough food in this world is by continuing to geneticly modify food and get more efficient in food production. Organic food production is not the future.

Steve Dairyman    
Vermont  |  April, 21, 2014 at 01:47 PM

The only reason that anyone would oppose GMO labeling is because it may hurt the sales of GMO foods. I think people have the right to know what is in their food and how it is produced. This is not a question of free speech. It is a question of people's right to know and make informed choices about what they eat and feed their families.

Jane Dairywoman    
Vermont  |  April, 22, 2014 at 10:43 AM

I oppose GMO labeling as passed by my lovely state because it's irresponsible. Sure, people have a right to know but that doesn't dictate a label. They can take the time to find out. There has been no economic analysis done on what affect this would have on food prices and I live in a part of Vermont where 80% of our kids get free or reduced lunch already. Would organic food also be required to label that they are allowed to have up to 5% GMO-sourced ingredients as well?

Henry Parsons    
MA  |  April, 23, 2014 at 04:50 AM

In spite of the fact that leading institutions have endorsed the safety of gmos there are those that reject them based on innuendos, fears, perception, and skepticism. If credible evidence proved a safety issue, they should be labelled. To require labeling based on paranoia, fueled by the organic left to stigmatize conventional food is completely wrong. This only proves that you "can't fix stupid." Shame on those VT legislators!!

Henry Parsons    
MA  |  April, 23, 2014 at 04:50 AM

In spite of the fact that leading institutions have endorsed the safety of gmos there are those that reject them based on innuendos, fears, perception, and skepticism. If credible evidence proved a safety issue, they should be labelled. To require labeling based on paranoia, fueled by the organic left to stigmatize conventional food is completely wrong. This only proves that you "can't fix stupid." Shame on those VT legislators!!


Massey Ferguson 5600 Series

Our most advanced multi-tasking mid-range ever. Perfect for livestock, dairy, hay, and general all-around farm work, these exceptional loader tractors ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

)
Feedback Form
Leads to Insight