USDA workshops to focus on drought challenges

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

For many producers and rural communities, the summer of 2012 has been defined by a record drought.

From the early days of this disaster, USDA has taken action to help. We’ve streamlined our disaster designation process, provided easier access to farm credit, opened more conservation lands for emergency haying and grazing, and much more.

Meanwhile, we continue to convene regular meetings of White House Rural Council to coordinate the Federal response and identify every effort we can take to provide additional help and assistance.

For example, the Small Business Administration and National Credit Union Administration have worked to increase emergency lending for small businesses. The Department of Interior has opened more Federal land for grazing. The Department of Transportation has taken measures to get more trucks on the road in the relief effort. And the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is working to preserve navigation routes on drought-stricken waterways.

At the same time, USDA’s tools are limited today. Many programs authorized under the 2008 Farm Bill expired on October 1. Other aspects of the law will continue to expire in the coming months. This brings tremendous uncertainty for rural families – particularly livestock producers who have lost access to disaster programs, and dairy producers who no longer have access to dairy support programs. But while this is a time of uncertainty, we will continue working to strengthen the drought response.

Today I would like to share with you one more step the Federal government will take to be sure we are helping communities during a tough time.

Over the next three weeks, USDA and other Federal agencies will partner with local stakeholders to conduct workshops in drought-impacted regions. The purpose of these workshops will be for us to listen to producers and communities regarding the intermediate and long-term challenges created by the current drought.

Recovery starts at the local level for all kinds of disaster.  An understanding of local needs is critical for USDA and other Federal agencies. In order to do the most good, we must ensure a strong partnership between local communities, states, tribes, and the Federal government.

These workshops will start in Omaha, Nebraska on October 9. Over the month of October, additional meetings will take place in Pueblo, Colorado; Pine Bluff, Arkansas; and Archbold, Ohio.

There’s no silver bullet to fix the drought. But these workshops will provide an important opportunity for folks to tell us what’s needed. They’ll provide a chance for everyone to learn which tools may be available to help. And the input we receive will help USDA, and other Federal agencies, respond effectively.

Today we remain committed to further strengthening Federal drought recovery efforts. To achieve this, we will continue working hard to expand partnerships with local, state, and tribal leaders in the weeks to come.

Comments (1) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

CO  |  October, 05, 2012 at 05:44 PM

The Farm Bill should not contain items for welfare, energy, broadband, housing, etc. and everything should stand on its own in any future bills to better control costs and eliminate the special interests and self-serving items being added. Farmers should not have their needs controlled by Food Stamps or other items and battles regarding help for a separate entity. The Senate Farm Bill should NOT be passed with this section still added: SEC. 12211. DEFINITION OF RURAL AREA FOR PURPOSES OF THE HOUSING ACT OF 1949 would increase the pool of recipients and increased rural community population requirement to 35,000. This population level would be a small City not a true rural community. Changing the Census date to 2020 insures those who have already received fair share of benefits over past years and now self-sufficient to continue receiving such benefits. The purpose of rural programs is to help very small struggling communities grow and become self-sufficient, not to become a Welfare System for self-sufficient communities who have already received past benefits wanting more. This section in the Senate Farm Bill and also in other bills such as House Bill H.R. 273 is Legislative Back Scratching just for the purpose of continuing to feed funding to self sufficient city governments. Given the U.S. current deficit and debt how does increasing the pool of recipients by adding those who have already had their fair share in the past being greedy and wanting more, serve the best interest of true rural communities? Please contact your legislators to help fix this issue.

5E Series

Introduced in 2013, the new 85 and 100 hp John Deere 5085E and 5100E feature 4-cylinder Interim Tier 4 emissions-compliant ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight