Nitrogen application recommendations for
Historically, tri-state (
Such a system, however, relies on the fact that nitrogen is inexpensive and over-application is not too costly, said Robert Mullen, an
“This approach has served agriculture well. The economic detriment due to over-application has historically been small from an economic standpoint,” said Mullen. “But as nitrogen prices have risen over the past several years, the economic penalty for over-application has reached a point where economic considerations need to be made. Producers, especially those managing large acreages, are beginning to look at fertilizer nitrogen application from an economic standpoint.”
Fertility specialists throughout the
“It boils down to an exercise in risk management. The old system uses a single value, while this new system gives farmers a range to work with,” said Mullen. “If farmers are risk averse, they can use the high side of the rate range. If they are more willing to accept risk, they can use a lower side of the rate range, increasing their potential for economic reward.”
“Is it always economical to shoot for maximum yield? Research has shown that it’s not,” said Mullen. “It may take the same amount of nitrogen to reach 179 bushels per acre as it does to only reach 170 bushels per acre. It’s impossible to determine at what point the nitrogen level is reached to where it is no longer a benefit to gain more yield without a nitrogen rate trial in every field.”
The





Comments (0) Leave a comment