Market manipulation?

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

During 2008, when markets were up limit one day and down limit the next, hedge funds and index traders caught the wrath of farmers, elevator grain merchandisers, and others who alleged improper activity and illegal market manipulation. So far the regulators have not hauled anyone or any company off to jail for such improprieties. But why?

The market volatility last year was not the result of concerted efforts by traders or illegal activity, says Dave Lehman, Director of Commodity Research and Product Development for the CME Group, which now operates the Chicago Board of Trade. Lehman’s presentation at the recent USDA Outlook Conference was designed to answer the questions of many farmers and others who looked upon the recent performance of the price discovery system with a jaundiced eye.

With research assistance by Informa Economics, eight different contracts on five exchanges were analyzed and matched with data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates exchanges. The investigation covered commercial hedgers, managed money traders, commodity index traders, and non-reportable traders during the period of January 2005 through June 30, 2008, when the recent bull market peaked.

The Informa researchers found:

  • Index traders had the most consistent trading pattern in the markets studied, getting into a contract 75 days before expiration and exiting 25 days before expiration.
  • Money Managers were the most erratic, trying to profit by investing their pool of money.
  • Commercial traders, such as grain processors, would enter the market early and maintain their positions, which were the largest positions.

During the 42 months studied:

  • Liquidity increased for corn, Chicago wheat, natural gas and crude oil futures.
  • Liquidity decreased for Kansas City and Minneapolis wheat and cotton.
  • There was no link to changes in liquidity and any group of traders.

Regarding market volatility:

  • The corn, wheat, and cotton market volatility had some correlation between index traders and money manager participation, but no evidence their participation increased the volatility.
  • There was an indication the corn, wheat and cotton, correlation could be connected to the long positions of index traders and the money managers who follow the market trend.

Was there a connection between price and changes in trader positions?

  • Changes in futures positions by any category did not cause a price change.
  • Changes in price caused many categories of traders to change positions.
  • Index trader and money manager activity did not drive price changes, but price changes drove their activity.

What was happening in the final 20 days of the life of a contract?

  • No trade group consistently influenced price levels in the final 20 days of trading.
  • Most of the agricultural futures contracts were more likely to be too cheap rather than too rich.

To corroborate the Informa study of the markets, Lehman pointed to USDA’s Amber Waves magazine which evaluated similar volatile periods in the 1970’s and 1990’s, as well as a recent study by the Government Accountability Office which found that federal laws do not prohibit the type of commodity trading being used, and a 2006 University of Illinois study on contract performance following changes in speculative limits.

For more, click here.

Source: University of Illinois



Comments (0) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left


Grand L60 Series

Kubota’s Grand L60 Series combines a higher level of luxury with outstanding productivity never before seen in this class of ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

)
Feedback Form
Leads to Insight