Congress has about 50/50 chance of passing farm bill in 2013

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

The chances of the U.S. Congress passing a five-year farm bill by year's end are a little better than 50/50 given the gridlock over food stamps for the poor, a top farm policy expert said on Monday.

Capitol "There is a slightly better chance than 50/50 that we will get a bill rolled into a budget at the end of the year. But it's no better than that," Barry Flinchbaugh, a Kansas State University agricultural economist who advises legislators shaping the U.S. farm bill, told Reuters on the sidelines of a farm bankers meeting in Minneapolis.

The farm bill, already a year behind schedule, is the master legislation that directs government supports for farmers and food aid programs.

The bill is now with a conference committee of 41 members of Congress who are hammering out the difference between the House and Senate bills. The biggest difference: the Senate wants $4 billion cut from food stamps while the House wants to reduce the program by $40 billion.

"Food is the only division. The other issues can be settled," said Flinchbaugh, citing variations in how they address crop insurance for farmers along with other subsidies.

Historically, the conference committee reconciles differences and brings a compromise to a final vote. That process has been hampered by the deep divisions between the Republican-controlled House and the Senate, where Democrats are in the majority.

"There is a way perhaps we can get past this food stamp gridlock. We cut food stamps $6-$8 billion and then we put in all these caveats the far right wants to put in the food stamp program, like work requirements and drug tests," said Flinchbaugh, who has advised on farm policy for over 40 years.

The government extended the expired 2008 farm bill last year. Leaders of the House and Senate agricultural committees have a self-imposed deadline of reaching agreement by Thanksgiving and the White House has threatened to veto a bill with large food stamp cuts.

If Congress fails to pass a new bill, a second extension is likely, Flinchbaugh said.

"There is some talk we will do that for two years because we don't want to be messing with this during an election year," Flinchbaugh said. "Or, we implement the permanent legislation."

Without a new law, U.S. farm policy will be dictated by an underlying 1938 permanent law that would bring back the concept of "price parity" which led to sharply higher guaranteed crop prices, Flinchbaugh said.

"It's normally been the safeguard to push the Congress to act," Flinchbaugh said. "But I've never seen a Congress like this one. So it's very hard to predict."

"Consumers are the biggest losers without a farm bill," he added.

Given the impasse on this farm bill - which traditionally has had bipartisan support - some farm analysts are suggesting this could be the last farm bill, ending 80 years of U.S. farm policy designed to protect farm price and income.

"If we remove food and nutrition bills from the farm bill this is the last one," Flinchbaugh said. "If we keep the consumer-farmer coalition together there will be future farm bills."

"There are 400 urban districts in the House of Representatives and 35 rural districts. When you're a minority like farmers - granted they are a potent minority because they produce food - but you remove nutrition and food stamp programs from the farm bill, the leverage is over.

"Another thing, if you take food stamps and nutrition programs out of the farm bill you're removing about 85 percent of USDA's budget. Can USDA survive with 15 percent of its budget? Likely not," Flinchbaugh said.



Comments (5) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

PowerOfChoice    
November, 12, 2013 at 12:50 PM

They need to trash the current Farm Bill and separate everything out. This would help reduce both the petty bickering between the far flung different items and also give opportunities to help reduce any fraud. A Farm Bill is supposed to be in place to help farmers when there is an emergency situation and to help insure proper food supply for the citizens of our country. It should not contain SNAP, housing, broadband, fuel subsidies, etc. These items are just pork added over the years for various legislative back scratching. We are 17+ Trillion dollars in debt and if something cannot stand alone, it should be considered garbage and thrown out. There are redundant items ... HUD has self help housing plus throughout this country there is Habitat for Humanity. Therefore, why does the Farm Bill also contain mutual self help housing which should only be under the government housing department authority. In Colorado many citizens now consider this program under the USDA as just another Corrupt and Abusive Federal Program. If they want to cut money from the Farm Bill then please be sure to cut out this now abusive program destroying the lives of citizens who worked hard for 20-30 years only to have $100,000 or more of their equity swiped from each family. Any program which takes that much from especially legally disabled or retired citizens to unjustly enrich others needs to be kicked out the door. Also, legislators need to STOP grandfathering rural areas as they have for 30+ years. Rural items were initially put in place to help very small communities grow and obtain clean water, etc., and has now become another Welfare System for larger communities wanting more taxpayer dollars. When is it going to stop???

KB    
VT  |  November, 13, 2013 at 09:41 AM

Here is a good article on why SNAP and food stamps should be part of the Farm Bill and some history on why it originally was tied together with the Farm Bill. http://billmoyers.com/2013/06/28/why-is- snap-part-of-the-farm-bill/ The term "Food Bill" would be a good replacement for "Farm Bill." People hear "farm" and wonder why food stamps have anything to do with a "Farm Bill." This term is misleading until you look deeper. Food stamps give people who need food assistance to purchase it. Without this assistance, much less food would be purchased. This would in turn hurt farmers and others in the agriculture industry. Looking back to why the Farm Bill was originally established may help educate people on its importance and help voters make more informed choices. SNAP and food stamps are important to the economic well- being of farmers.

Ken    
Batavia, NY  |  November, 13, 2013 at 10:20 AM

Lets just end the subsidies. If this requires an end to these 5 year Soviet style farm bills then so be it.

Craig A. Moore    
Billings, MT  |  November, 14, 2013 at 08:46 AM

Then we can stop paying people for damage to their homes and businesses because they refuse to carry the proper amount of insurance. Like on the coast after storms.

Ken    
Batavia, NY  |  November, 14, 2013 at 11:58 AM

Right on Craig. End all of this wasteful spending


Biotal Forage Inoculants

"Biotal offers a range of forage inoculants proven to help win the battle to preserve feed quality and value. Call ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight