IDFA praises House vote on Goodlatte-Scott amendment

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Editor's note: Although the U.S. House of Repesentatives passed the Goodlatte-Scott amendment to the farm bill, which removed a controversial measure that would limit milk production increases in times of unfavorable price margins, it became somewhat academic later in the day when the House failed to pass the farm bill itself. 

Jerry Slominski, senior vice president of legislative affairs and economic policy with the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA), released the following statement on the overwhelming, bi-partisan passage of the Goodlatte-Scott amendment:

"IDFA commends the House of Representatives for voting, 291-135, to reform our dairy policies by establishing a new and expanded revenue insurance program for dairy farmers without imposing a controversial program that will have our government get into the business of limiting milk supplies, hurting consumers and costing American jobs. The momentum is now strongly against supply management for our dairy industry.

The Goodlatte-Scott amendment will provide an effective and expanded safety net for dairy farmers but without adding a program that will make healthy and nutritious dairy products less affordable for our nation?s families. And, it will allow dairy companies, particularly dairy exporters, to continue to grow and create jobs.

IDFA is grateful for the strong bipartisan support from all across our country but particularly to Representatives Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) and David Scott (D-GA) for sponsoring this amendment, to the cosponsors of the amendment, to the Representatives who spoke out during the floor debate and to the many other Representatives who reached out to their colleagues to help win this vote.

We also thank House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) for his strong and consistent support throughout the Farm Bill process.

We look forward to passage of the Farm Bill by the whole of Congress and to reforming our dairy support programs without also forcing families to pay more for dairy products or limiting our industry?s ability to capture new export markets. The entire dairy industry will be stronger as a result."



Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Suzanne Buell    
Conn  |  June, 23, 2013 at 07:21 AM

Okay if the consumer isn't supposed to pay enough for milk to give the farmer a decent price without having to buy insurance to supplement the pay price received, are the processors ready to step up and make less profit so to pass the money along to us so we can stay in business to provide their product to process? I don't see news stories about the cost of soda or junk food going up, or bottled water or Gatorade. But no seems to have any problem paying more for them because milk is cheap. What really burns me is the packaging is getting smaller and smaller and the price stays the same so you aren't supposed to notice you are paying so much more for what you get.


HT Dye Marker

Harvest Tec’s bale marker identifies high moisture areas of square bales by spraying a food-grade red dye on the ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight