Pasteurized waste milk and gut bacteria

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

While research has documented conclusively that pasteurizing waste milk significantly reduces bacterial levels in the liquid calf feed source, USDA researchers have taken an interesting look at how the feeding practice affects long-term gut flora in the animals.

Researcher Tom Edrington and his colleagues at the USDA Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center near College Station, Texas, conducted the 180-calf study. Calves were raised with similar practices on two different farms; the main difference being that one group was fed a diet of non-pasteurized waste milk, while the other group received pasteurized waste milk. Both farm sites were large, commercial dairies with more than 3,000 cows.

Fecal samples were taken on both farms from 15 calves in each of six age groups — 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks of age. Samples were evaluated for bacterial presence using DNA testing.  Among the findings were:

  • Bacteria numbers were lower in the pasteurized group at only one evaluation point – the first week of life. After that, the populations were higher in the pasteurized group, and grew steadily with age in both groups. The figure above shows this progression, with “P” representing the pasteurized group and “NP” representing the non-pasteurized group. The researchers speculate that this surprising result may have been due to recolonization of pasteurized waste milk between pasteurization and feeding.
  • Treponema, an important, beneficial bacterium in cattle rumen, was more prevalent in the pasteurized group, and became higher in the older animals from this group. This finding allayed the researchers’ concerns that pasteurization might have a negative effect on the establishment of “good” bacteria in the digestive tract.
  • Salmonella, a harmful, scours-causing bacterium, was found at significant levels only in the non-pasteurized group at week 1. After that, it was not significant in either group. The researchers conclude that this finding coincides with clinical findings on dairy farms — that Salmonella is of greatest consequence in very young calves, and is of less consequence as calves age. They also suggest that the overall results suggest that milk-borne transmission of Salmonella is not as significant as fecal transfer, and, in this case, the presence of higher Salmonella numbers in young calves may have been due to fecal exposure on the dairy.

“The somewhat surprising results of this study suggest that the recontamination of waste milk following pasteurization may provide a better source of bacteria for gut establishment,” concludes Edrington. He adds that in future research, two additional factors would help deliver more conclusive results:

  • Using animals that all are raised on the same farm.
  • Testing pasteurized milk for bacterial levels just prior to feeding.


Comments (4) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Mark Quinn, DVM    
Melissa, Texas  |  September, 10, 2012 at 08:57 PM

How about some performance information to see if there is an economic benefit to the pasteurization? This may well depend on premise sanitation practices, etc. Many variables to consider. Thanks, MQ

hafiz wasi    
lahore,pakistan  |  September, 11, 2012 at 01:52 AM

though it is already believed the results found here however such experiments should continue so that farmers may find use of farm wastes like this

Dieter Harle    
Bettendorf, IA  |  September, 11, 2012 at 10:41 AM

This may well give reason why those of us suspicious in the "over-pasteurized" milk vs "raw" see gratification that not all is - as we thought! Hope this subject gets more research and print in regard to what immunity level at farm is with seasonal impact.

Mike B    
Wisconsin  |  September, 13, 2012 at 09:39 AM

The number one comment i get after the dairyman buys a pasteurizer from me is why didn't i buy one years ago, the dairyman's mortality rate is almost nill. If they want a real test it should have been on one farm instead of two there are to many varibles between two farms.


Moisture Tracker™

The Moisture Tracker is a hand-held, Near-Infra-Red (NIR) scanning device, which rapidly measures the dry matter and moisture content of ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Leads to Insight