Editor’s note: This article was written by Craig Thomas, extension dairy educator with Michigan State University and first appeared in the Michigan Dairy Review.

Dairy producers spend a great deal of time, effort and money ensuring that dairy cow rations are fine-tuned to the “nth” degree. A few milligrams of this, a few parts per million of that, all to ensure that no stone goes unturned in the quest for the perfect ration. Unfortunately, in the process the most important nutrient of all often goes barely noticed and only lightly considered. What nutrient? Water.

Recall that water weighs 8.35 lb/gal Even though we normally don’t think in such terms, water by weight, is the largest component of the daily ration for all classes of dairy animals (see Table 1 below). This is particularly true of the milking cow. If you consider her total ration, it will contain somewhere around 50-60 lb of dry matter (DM) per day in the form of what we normally think of as “ration” (carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins, and minerals).

But, just as importantly or even more, the ration also consists of about 42 gallons of drinking water. When you convert the total water consumption to weight the milking cow is consuming around 420 lb of water per day (42 gal. drinking water X 8.35 lb/gal + 120 lb as fed ration X 55 percent water = 350.7 lb drinking water + 66.0 lb water from feed = 416.7 lb total water intake per day). That means that the dry matter intake we usually focus on accounts for only about 12 percent of the cow’s total nutrient intake; while water accounts for about 88 percent. In fact, the water requirement of a lactating dairy cow on a per pound of body weight basis is the highest of any land-based mammal (10).

How Much Attention Does Drinking Water Receive on Your Farm?
Drinking water should receive your attention in two regards: 1) water quality (Is your water fit to drink based on its chemical and mineral composition?”), and, 2) water delivery (Are you providing an ample supply of good quality, fresh, clean water to your cattle?).

According to Michigan State University’s Dr. David Beede (1, 2) the most important constituents to evaluate in regards to water quality are: total dissolved solids (TDS), sulfate (SO4), chloride, (Cl), iron (Fe), and nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N).

Total dissolved solids measures the sum of all inorganic matter dissolved in water (9), and is an indicator of the salinity of water (1, 2). Experts usually recommend that TDS levels above 1,000 ppm should be investigated further and potentially be corrected to prevent and/or correct problems like diarrhea and dehydration (4).

If the combined sulfate + chloride content of dairy cattle drinking water is greater than 500 ppm, further testing and evaluation are needed (1, 2). At higher than recommended levels, these minerals may lead to health and production problems. For example, some have observed that high levels of sulfate + chloride cause diarrhea and dehydration in calves, plus increased retained placentas and displaced abomasums in fresh cows (1).

Nitrate-nitrogen levels in cattle drinking water should not exceed 20 ppm (1, 2). High nitrate-nitrogen levels have been associated with long-term reproductive problems in dairy cows, such as higher services per conception, lower first service conception rates, and longer calving intervals (5).

If dairy cattle drinking water contains over 0.3 ppm iron cows may suffer from iron toxicity. Iron in drinking water is in the ferrous state (Fe2+) and is soluble, odorless, and easily absorbed in the animal’s gut. However, most dairy rations provide more than adequate iron which is in the less absorbable ferric state (Fe3+).

This form of iron is converted in the animal’s gut to ferrous iron (Fe2+) and absorbed for use by the animal’s tissues. When drinking water contains excess ferrous iron (Fe2+) this may lead to excess ferric iron (Fe2+) in the animal’s tissues causing “oxidative stress” where cell membranes lose integrity. This can lead to increased retained placentas, mastitis, metritis, and a general compromising of the animal’s immune system (2, 4). Problems related to depressed immune function are more likely to show up in transition and fresh cows, reducing peak milk yield.

High iron in drinking water also may depress water intake due to palatability issues although this is not well understood (4). Excess soluble iron (Fe2+) in the animal’s gut also reduces absorption of other key minerals like zinc and copper (4). In addition to the problems these various water constituents may cause to cattle health and performance they also may contribute to problems with your farm’s water delivery system e.g., pumps and pipes) and the effectiveness of pipeline cleaning and sanitizing.

This could in turn lead to increased bacteria counts and buildup within water pipes restricting water flow. For example, high iron levels in water encourage the growth of iron bacteria that plug pipes and coat pumps and other water system components with a slick, rust-colored slime.

How Should You Address Water Quality Issues?
First, you should test your cattle’s drinking water on a quarterly basis for TDS, sulfate, chloride, iron, and nitrate-nitrogen (4). Second, you should check to make sure your dairy facility’s water delivery system meets guidelines for number of waterers, space, location, and cleanliness .

A 1-page fact sheet (Three Common Drinking Water Problems on Dairy Farms) providing clues on these issues along with guidelines for taking water samples for analysis and potential certified laboratories that analyze water samples is available by e-mailing your request to thomasc@msu.edu or download it from the MSU Extension Dairy Team Web site.

Thumb H20 Project
To examine these important water issues even further, I conducted a project called the Thumb H2O Project. This project involved 37 dairy farms in Huron, Sanilac, St. Clair, and Tuscola Counties.

Milking cow drinking water was sampled on each farm and then analyzed using the services of a certified commercial laboratory** (7). The water analysis test used is called the “Livestock Suitability Test” and included sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), pH, nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), sulfate (SO4), conductivity, total dissolved solids (TDS), iron (Fe), chloride (Cl), and copper (Cu). In addition, data were collected on these farms from their milking parlors and milking cow housing facilities concerning number of waterers, space, location, and cleanliness.

Water quality issues were found on 27.0 percent of the farms sampled. Table 2 breaks down these potential water quality issues into five categories. High total dissolved solids were found on 13.5 percent of farms with TDS levels as high as 3,770 ppm. Sulfate + chloride problems were found on 8.1 percent of farms with sulfate + chloride levels as high as 2,016 ppm. High iron was found on 10.8 percent of farms, with levels as high as 0.81 ppm.

None of the farms’ water samples showed elevated levels of nitrate-nitrogen. The highest nitrate-nitrogen level found was only 1.8 ppm. One farm had a high pH (9.48). This was included as a potential water quality problem because EPA water quality guidelines for human consumption suggest that a pH of greater than 8.5 can result in water having a bitter taste, reduce the germicidal effectiveness of chlorine, and is corrosive to pipes. The effect of drinking water pH on animal performance and health has not been well researched.

These data clearly indicated that potential water quality issues do exist on nearly one quarter of the farms tested. Every dairy participating in the study was encouraged to perform follow-up water analyses to confirm/deny that the potential water quality issues detected are real and whether water treatment strategies should be sought to correct these problems. MSU Extension encourages all dairy farmers to implement a routine water testing program on their operation and track these analyses over time. Water quality is not something that remains constant, but rather changes as the underlying aquifer changes. Also, some farms on this study sourced cow drinking water from more than one well. Thus, be sure all sources of drinking water for your operation are included in your testing program.

* This project was funded by donations from T & K Consulting (Jerry Krummrey), Mason; CO-OP Quality Feeds, Inc., Pigeon; Eastern Michigan Bank, Croswell; Quality Liquid Feeds (Joe Wiest), Plainview; Michigan Milk Producers Association, Novi; and Deckerville Veterinary Clinic, Deckerville.

** Michigan State University Extension’s mentioning of one laboratory does not constitute recommendation of the laboratory to the exclusion of others.

1. Beede, D.K. 2004. Water intake and supply for dairy cattle. Michigan Dairy Review, Vol. 9, No. 3; July, 2004.

2. Beede, D.K. 2006. Evaluation of water quality and nutrition for dairy cattle. Proc. High Plains Dairy Conference. Viewed at www.msu.edu/~beede/dairycattlewaterandnutrition.pdf .

3. Beede, D.K. Sampling and Analysis of Drinking Water for Dairy Cattle. Viewed at www.msu.edu/~beede/takingawatersample.pdf

4. Beede, D.K. 2009. Presentation given at Western Dairy Management Conference. Reno, NV. Viewed at www.msu.edu/~beede/Beede_Water_WDMC_Mar13_2009.pdf.

5. Kahler, L. W., N. A. Jorgensen, L. D. Satter, W. J. Tyler, J. W. Crowley, and M. F. Finner. 1974. Effect of nitrate in drinking water on reproductive and productive efficiency of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 58:771.

6. Looper, M.L. and D.N. Waldner. 2007. Water for Dairy Cattle. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, ANSI-4275.

7. Midwest Laboratories, Inc. 13611 “B” Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68144-3693; 402-334-7770 (voice); 402-334-9121 (fax); www.midwestlabs.com.

8. National Research Council (NRC). 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Ed., National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.

9. Patience, J. F. 1994. Water quality and quantity: importance in animal and poultry production. Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Proc. Alltech’s 5th Annual Symposium. pp. 121-138.

10 Woodford, S., M. Murphy, and C. Davis. 1985. Why cows need water. Dairy Herd Management. No. 2, Vol. 15, pp. 36-40.

 Source: Michigan Dairy Review