Another missed opportunity to improve milk quality

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

SCC The bureaucrats punted again.

For the seventh time in 16 years, the National Conference on Interstate Milk Shipments (NCIMS) has turned down a request to upgrade the standard for somatic cell count.

The NCIMS, made up of state regulators who oversee milk-safety rules, last week turned down a request from the National Milk Producers Federation to lower the SCC legal limit from 750,000 cells/mL to 400,000, starting in 2015.

In previous years, similar proposals by the NMPF or the National Mastitis Council also were voted down. One possible explanation: The regulators who make up NCIMS are primarily responsible for milk safety and somatic cell count is not a milk-safety issue. 

Because the NCIMS only meets every other year, it will be 2015 before the proposal can be debated again. 

Many in the dairy industry have argued that lowering the limit from 750,000 to 400,000 would bring the United States in greater harmony with the rest of the world, which would boost the other countries’ confidence in U.S. exports.

Here is a statement from the National Milk Producers Federation expressing disappointment over the NCIMS vote.

“…Dairy farmers in the world’s major milk-producing regions have made great strides in reducing somatic cell count levels. Regulatory systems around the world have moved to incorporate these lower somatic cell count levels, and the U.S. needs to be on board with that process, not be left watching from the side of the road by the failure to update our standards,” said Jerry Kozak, president and CEO of the National Milk Producers Federation. “We continue to be perplexed by the inconsistency of those state regulators who voted to make it easier to import Grade A dairy products into the United States by outsourcing mandatory inspections, while at the same time rejecting efforts to facilitate the export of American dairy products,” he said.

“A similar somatic cell count proposal was defeated by the NCIMS in 2011. Since then, the European Union has moved ahead with a somatic cell count limit of 400,000 for dairy products being exported by the U.S. to EU member countries.

“While the NCIMS has performed admirably in protecting the safety of Grade A milk and dairy products for more than 60 years, we are now in a global dairy marketplace and the Conference needs to recognize this reality,” Kozak said.

“Our farmers are doing their part by continuing to provide ever-higher quality milk, but they are not getting credit for it with overseas customers because we are at the mercy of a regulatory mechanism that seems unwilling to maintain the same pace of improvement. Unfortunately, NCIMS is currently the only national regulatory forum at which to resolve these important issues for the dairy industry,” he said.

“NMPF also expressed disappointment at the NCIMS delegates’ rejection this week of a resolution calling for the enhanced enforcement of federal labeling regulations affecting the marketing of imitation Grade A dairy products, such as soy, hemp and rice ‘milks,’ and soy and rice ‘yogurt.’ The recommendation was also opposed by representatives of the dairy processing community.

“Without the backing of state and federal regulators, and the dairy processing community itself, the nation’s dairy farmers remain the sole advocates for enforcement of proper labeling on imitation dairy products. It is disappointing that the leadership of the dairy processing industry spoke out against the labeling enforcement resolution,” Kozak added.

Prev 1 2 Next All

Comments (6) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Southeast  |  April, 29, 2013 at 12:35 PM

I don't think the politicians punted, I think they made a good choice. Why do you think our industry needs to self regulate itself out of business and why do you think we need the government putting stricter rules in place. Why not let the market dictate what the quality of milk is. Huge improvements have been made in the southeast because customers demanded it - not because we increased regulation. And, you always seem to forget that this is a very large country with diverse needs. Not everything that is positive for one region is positive for another region. I applaud this decision and it was nice to see them stand up for the farmer against NMPF. Who they work for is still undecided - I sure know its not the guy milking cows for a living.

Dr Dan    
Ohio  |  May, 05, 2013 at 03:03 PM

I agree. Let the market dictate the changes. I agree we should be at 400,000 but let the market say that. The fastest way to achieve that goal is a premium or a discount by the private industry, not government regulation. Nothing talks louder that the dollar

new york  |  May, 07, 2013 at 05:45 AM

Most coops do pay a small premium. Not sure how it pencils out for everyone else but it does not pay enough to make very much of an effort for me. I do not test with DHIA and usually run under 150,000. If testing would bring me under 100,000 the difference in my milk check would not even pay half the cost. Dr Dan the same could be said for the current FARM welfare guidelines by NMPF. If you want a value added product be willing to pay for it.

Wisconsin  |  May, 15, 2013 at 01:10 AM

I agree that the SCC counts should be under 400,000. But in the smaller herds a single cow can, and often does, wreak total havoc on quality. A farm could be producing high quality milk and then suddenly everything is out of control. What then? I like looking at the awards for producing high quality milk hagning on the wall but dang!,.... somethings. Talk of letting the markets decide whether or not the quality should improve is a good thing to hear. The processor is the one who answers first to customer demands. Eventually those demads must be met by the producer. Forgien markets are a fact of life in this economy. We have to adapt.

Matt Jewart    
May, 15, 2013 at 06:43 AM

Land O'Lakes has already lowered their Levels and Maryland Virginia is following as are many others. Privately we are meeting the needs of exports. Those dairies that think the can't lower their SCC need to start figuring it out because the industry will dictate it.

new york  |  May, 24, 2013 at 10:25 PM

So an update. Dairylea just made it harder to get quality premiums because too many farmers were qualifying. So the better we do at making quality milk the harder it will get to offset the cost of producing that high quality milk.

AG10 Series Silage Defacers

Loosen silage while maintaining a smooth, compacted bunker space resulting in better feed and less waste. This unique tool pierces, ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides