House deals shock defeat to farm bill

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Republican budget-cutters joined with Democratic defenders of food stamps on Thursday to deal a shocking defeat to the proposed $500 billion, five-year farm bill backed by Republican leaders, undermining hopes of enacting such legislation before the current stop-gap law expires.

"Today's failure leaves the entire food and agriculture sector in the lurch," the American Soybean Association, a group which represents growers, said in a statement.

Frank Lucas, chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, said there may not be another chance to craft a farm bill this year.

The level of funding for food stamps for low-income Americans was the major issue for the farm bill. Lucas' bill called for the largest cuts in food stamps in a generation.

The Senate passed a bill last week that proposed a $4 billion cut, compared to the $20 billion cut of the House bill. The cuts in the House legislation would have ended benefits to 2 million people, or about 4 percent of enrollment.

Majority Leader Eric Cantor blamed Democrats for the outcome, saying they were not interested in consensus.

Steny Hoyer, the assistant Democratic leader, said the bill failed because Republicans insisted on "egregious" changes to food stamps.

All but two dozen Democrats in the House voted against the bill. The biggest surprise was that about one quarter of the Republican majority also voted no, in most instances because they wanted the bill to include deeper cuts to food stamps and other programs than proposed. The 234-195 vote undermined hopes of enacting a farm bill before the current stop-gap law expires in the fall.

Moments before defeat, Lucas appealed to his colleagues, "Vote with me to move this forward ... if it fails today, I cannot guarantee you'll see in this session another attempt."

"I am glad we stood up for children," said Sheila Jackson Lee, a Texas Democrat, after the vote.

The bill died in the House in 2012 in an election-year gridlock that also revolved mostly around food stamp cuts.

The just-passed Senate farm bill proposed $24 billion in savings, half of it from traditional crop subsidies. Both bills proposed to cut conservation programs by $6 billion while streamlining them.

And both would expand the taxpayer-subsidized crop insurance program, including policies for cotton and peanut growers to protect them from fluctuations in crop revenue.



Comments (5) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

anonymous    
W. Nebraska  |  June, 20, 2013 at 06:19 PM

Our leaders cant even pass a farm bill, so I wont fill out an agricultural census. If they aren't responsible enough to pass a farm bill over this long period of time I am not going to fill out an ag census. I encourage others to do the same.. They keep calling and I keep putting them off.

Jay    
Ohio  |  June, 21, 2013 at 08:59 AM

We don't need a farm bill to begin with so they should just repeal the whole thing. The current bill is nothing more then an attempt to shovel taxpayer money to wealthy investors and politically connection Ag lobbies. The food stamp program should be its own seperate welfare bill and the only reason it is in a farm bill is to hide the cost and buy votes because midwest congressmen don't want to be anti-ag. No they shouldn't put it off, but repeal the whole dang thing.

Gayle    
pa  |  June, 21, 2013 at 09:20 AM

guess I just don't see why food stamps and welfare needs to be part of the farm bill who thought this was a good idea?!...also am against the DSA where a dairy farmer needs to buy insurance to be paid a fair price for the milk. The only people who make out financially then is the processors and insusrance co,

Matt    
CT  |  June, 21, 2013 at 09:23 AM

I think that it is time that the farm bill be defeated permanently, and SNAP programs be turned over to state control. Let the futures market and farmers control agriculture production in the nation and not the government.

Brian    
VA  |  June, 21, 2013 at 09:30 AM

Those who love liberty have won a temporary victory by an unholy alliance. If farmers would reject this farmfare program that they don;t really need it would be easier to see that this is a giant waste of money.


Ag-Bag MX1012

The Ag-Bag MX1012 Commercial Silage Bagger is an ideal engine-driven mid-size bagger, designed to serve the 150- to 750-head dairy ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides