Murphy: Meat Too?

The Humane Society of the United States doesn't want to see consumers continue to eat meat and consume other animal products.

Here’s a question asked by an animal welfare supporter that absolutely floored me: “Which red-blooded male hasn’t sexually harassed somebody?”

Erika Brunson, an 83-year-old board member of the Humane Society of the United States, posed that question to a reporter from The New York Times in a story published two weeks ago. “We’d have no CEOs and no executives of American companies if none of them had affairs,” she said.

First of all, to reply directly to the initial question: Me, that’s who. Somehow, I seem to have navigated an adult life and career without once sexually harassing a woman.

And second, seriously? Not every CEO has harassed someone, although to Ms. Brunson’s point, the most recent executive so accused (credibly) is the CEO of the organization on whose board she sits: Wayne Pacelle, disgraced ex-CEO of HSUS.

Brunson’s observation, according to an article on Pacific Standard magazine’s website, represents “a troubling paradox at the intersection of animal advocacy and sexual harassment.”

Animal activist groups, to be sure, portray themselves as bulwarks against exploitation, as defenders of animals (allegedly) abused by producers and meatpackers. Thus, as the article noted, there’s no small amount of irony in an organizational culture that projects as its principal values protection of the weak and powerless.

“Organizations such as HSUS, PETS, Mercy for Animals, Farm Sanctuary, Direct Action Everywhere — and dozens of others — aim to protect society’s most vulnerable beings from exploitation,” the article noted. “The depth of empathy required … would seem to be at odds with a swaggering bro-culture where women are systematically demeaned and intimidated.”

Ya think?

Compounding Problems
Even the most outspoken critics of animal agriculture have recognized the problem.

Carol Adams, author of “The Sexual Politics of Meat,” offered a recent blogpost noting that, “We are realizing that the progressive values that aim to prevent cruelty, suffering, and harassment of animals have in some ways failed to be truly applied to the treatment of women (and some men) in our workplaces.”

(By the way, the article also noted that Paul Shapiro, HSUS’s former vice president of policy who stepped aside in December, had also been accused of fostering a sexually intimidating workplace, once allegedly emerging naked from a bathroom in a hotel room he was sharing with a woman colleague — except for “strategically placed” boxer briefs.)

The article noted that Shapiro and Pacelle were largely responsible for many of the initiatives HSUS successfully pursued, such as California’s Prop 2 measure that set aggressive housing standards for veal calves, egg layers and pregnant sows. And while they can’t claim full credit, both were instrumental in leveraging McDonald’s and eventually other fast-food chains to source cage-free eggs.

That’s the central factor complicating the “intersection of animal advocacy and sexual harassment:” The leadership of the animal welfare industry is largely male, the very men accused of preying and abusing their female co-workers.

Of course, the only significant exception to that patriarchy is PETA’s founder Ingrid Newkirk, whose organization is best known for utilizing highly suggestive imagery of near-naked women in its anti-meat and anti-fur campaigns, ads that even the left-leaning Pacific Standard characterized as “brutally objectifying women, thereby undermining whatever gender justice might be achieved through charismatic female leadership.”

Obviously, inappropriate behavior is rampant in many business sectors besides animal activism. However, the difference is that those other industries aren’t preaching to the rest of us about morality and ethics.

Hollywood has long acknowledged that, far from being some sort of moral leader, its business is pushing the envelope of acceptability in terms of sex and violence for the (no longer) cheap thrills they provide the movie-going audience.

And corporate marketers explicitly step back from even pretending to set standards, in that their only goals are generating sales and ensuring profitability for their investors.

As the Pacific Standard article noted, “Women in the animal welfare world often feel so deeply about their cause that they make radical personal choices to reduce animal suffering. They go vegan; they don’t wear animal products; they avoid forms of entertainment that harm animals.”

And they could have added that women also shell out the bulk of the multi-millions that animal activist organizations rake in on an annual basis.

So in consideration of all that, until those groups clean up their own house and become better role models of the principles they insist we need to embody, they could do with a little less preaching and a lot more practicing what they preach.

Editor’s Note: The opinions in this commentary are those of Dan Murphy, a veteran journalist and commentator.



Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
5 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Submitted by Mehta Trevor on Thu, 02/15/2018 - 08:00

Times of crisis require us to become more, not less, open to change and innovation, and more willing to step into a leadership role. This is a time for “distributed leadership.” Distributed leadership, seeks a balance between top-down and bottom-up leadership, where information and influence flow freely, and employees act as entrepreneurs providing new solutions and citizens take power back into their own hands around issues they care about.

Submitted by Hair Stylist Marketing on Thu, 02/15/2018 - 09:25

I will be interested in more similar topics. i see you got really very useful topics , i will be always checking your blog thanks Hair Stylist Marketing

Submitted by Sam Olsen on Thu, 02/15/2018 - 19:06

Wayne Pacelle’s misconduct at HSUS goes far beyond sexual harassment allegations. He has, as a matter of routine, lied about his accomplishments and used charitable resources to publicize false claims that elevated his stature and fostered the kind of hero worship that has been so pervasive. This put the women he interacted with at a tremendous disadvantage when considering whether or not to report inappropriate behavior. His fabricated victories enabled his predatory ways by attracting followers and by insulating him from accountability and exposure.

Pacelle generated tremendous publicity for himself when he announced a legislative deal with United Egg Producers, which he claimed would “outlaw battery cages nationwide.” In reality, that deal would have kept laying hens confined inside egg factory cages in perpetuity.

Facing litigation that included charges of bribery, money laundering, and obstruction of justice (a check signed by Pacelle was apparently used to pay a witness who had repeatedly lied under oath), HSUS settled a massive RICO lawsuit by paying the owners of Ringling Brothers Circus millions of dollars of charitable donations that should have been used to protect animals. That’s in addition to all the money in legal fees that were paid out. This use of charitable dollars – to cover the improper conduct of Pacelle and other executive staff – was not unlike the misuse of funds used to essentially buy the silence of women allegedly sexually harassed at HSUS.

Details here:

You are correct that Pacelle and Shapiro are largely responsible for Prop 2 in California. But from many people's perspective, that was the biggest blunder in animal rights history. Pacelle squandered over $10 million dollars on that botched 2008 initiative and it resulted in millions of laying hens being subjected to more than nine years (and counting) of preventable cage confinement. Nevertheless, Pacelle’s continuously repeated lie that he had “outlawed” battery cages in California has been his biggest claim to fame. Pacelle and the egg industry have now introduced yet another ballot initiative in California. This new initiative is opposed by many animal activists as it would declare battery cages legal in California for additional years and would forever allow the egg industry to provide hens with as little as one square foot of floor space per bird.

Details here:

None of the above would have been possible without the complicity of the HSUS executive staff and members of the board of directors. Just as Pacelle provided cover for Paul Shapiro, HSUS’s senior staff and board members have covered for Pacelle’s behavior.

Thus, even with Pacelle (officially) gone, his enablers remain in firm control and a culture of secrecy and corruption still looms at the top of HSUS. There needs to be a clean sweep.

Submitted by xiaojun on Tue, 06/12/2018 - 23:24

20180613 junda

Submitted by linying123 on Fri, 06/22/2018 - 01:11