Industry News

A Decade at the Helm: IDFA CEO Michael Dykes to Retire in 2026

Fri, 15 May 2026 16:59:13 GMT

The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) is preparing for a major leadership transition after President and CEO Michael Dykes, D.V.M., announced plans to retire at the end of 2026, closing out a decade at the helm of the organization.

The announcement sets in motion a formal succession process, with IDFA’s Executive Council officer group forming a committee to oversee the selection of the association’s next president and CEO. Dykes will remain in his role through Dec. 31, 2026, ensuring continuity as the organization navigates the transition.

“Michael has been a transformational leader for IDFA and for the U.S. dairy industry,” says Daragh Maccabee, chair of the IDFA Executive Council. “Over the past decade, he has strengthened IDFA’s credibility, expanded its influence, and helped position the association and the dairy industry for long-term success. Under his leadership, IDFA has built one of the strongest advocacy teams in Washington, strengthened its financial position, expanded industry engagement across the supply chain, and helped deliver extraordinary momentum for dairy both domestically and globally. The organization is exceptionally well positioned for the future.”

Dykes joined International Dairy Foods Association in 2017, stepping into the role at a time when the industry was facing big questions around policy, trade and consumer perception. Since then, he’s helped steer the organization through a period of steady growth and some of its most visible policy wins in recent years.

“It has been the privilege of a lifetime to serve America’s dairy industry and to lead this outstanding organization,” Dykes says. “Together, our members, board leaders, and talented team have strengthened dairy’s voice, expanded opportunities for our industry, and positioned dairy as an essential part of America’s future. I have never been more optimistic about the trajectory of the U.S. dairy industry or the strength of IDFA heading into the next decade.”

Under his leadership, IDFA expanded its membership and worked to better connect the full dairy supply chain under one umbrella, strengthening how the industry speaks on policy issues in Washington. That work helped elevate dairy’s role in nutrition policy, including recent federal dietary guidelines that reaffirmed dairy as a core food group and recognized dairy foods across fat levels as part of healthy dietary patterns.

The association also played a key role in advancing the bipartisan Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act, which restored whole and reduced-fat milk options in schools and expanded choices for students and families.

On the trade side, Dykes pushed to strengthen U.S. dairy’s position in global markets, including through advisory roles with the Office of the United States Trade Representative and the Agricultural Policy Advisory Committee. Those efforts have been part of a broader push to keep U.S. dairy competitive internationally.

More recently, he helped launch the IDFA Foundation in 2022 and expanded nutrition incentive programs tied to SNAP, aimed at improving access to dairy as an affordable, nutrient-dense food.

His tenure also included leading through major disruptions, including the COVID-19 pandemic, when dairy plants were deemed essential infrastructure to keep food moving, and during Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza outbreaks, when the industry worked closely with government to maintain confidence in dairy safety and supply chains.

Dykes will stay on through the end of 2026 as the search for his successor moves forward.

A Legacy of Strategic Strength: Barbara O’Brien Announces Retirement from Dairy Management Inc.

Thu, 05 Mar 2026 16:42:51 GMT

After a career defined by strategic transformation and a relentless focus on the U.S. dairy farmer, Barbara O’Brien, president and CEO of Dairy Management Inc. (DMI) and the Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy, has announced she will retire at the conclusion of her five-year term this fall.

O’Brien’s tenure, which began with a unanimous board appointment in October 2021, has been marked by a shift toward unified action. Under her leadership, the dairy checkoff evolved from a collection of individual efforts into a synchronized powerhouse, aligning domestic marketing, nutrition science and global exports under a singular vision.

A Deliberate Departure

True to her reputation for meticulous planning, O’Brien emphasizes her retirement is not an ending, but a handoff from a position of organizational health.

“As we looked ahead, we knew this is the right and responsible time to give the organization ample runway for a well-managed transition as the DMI board and search committee plan from a position of strength,” O’Brien said.

This sentiment echoes her long-standing philosophy on leadership. In previous discussions regarding the industry’s future, O’Brien has often noted “the strength of the checkoff lies in its ability to adapt before the market demands it.” By initiating this transition now, she ensures the momentum of the current three-year unified plan remains undisturbed.

Driving Measurable Impact

O’Brien’s impact is perhaps most visible through her work with the Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy. She successfully bridged the gap between the farm gate and the corporate boardroom, bringing together 28 dairy companies to collaborate on precompetitive initiatives. A hallmark of her leadership was the U.S. Dairy Stewardship Commitment, which has now been adopted by 39 companies representing 77% of U.S. milk production.

Marilyn Hershey, a Pennsylvania dairy farmer and chair of DMI, says O’Brien’s ability to unite the value chain has been pivotal.

“Barbara has led the dairy checkoff with vision, integrity and a relentless focus on results for dairy farmers,” Hershey says. “Her ability to unite organizations, strengthen partnerships and build momentum around a clear strategy has positioned the checkoff and the broader dairy community for continued success.”

The Mission Remains

While the leadership may change, O’Brien is adamant the trajectory of the organization is set. She has spent the last several years building a deep bench of talent within the staff and fostering the next generation of dairy farmer leaders to ensure the work continues.

“I want to be very clear: our work does not slow down, shift or lose focus,” O’Brien says. “The mission does not change. The priorities remain clear. And the work continues without interruption.”

As the DMI board begins its search for a successor, O’Brien will continue to lead through the fall, ensuring the transition is as seamless as the strategic alignment she spent her career building.

USDA Announces Plan to Address Rural Veterinary Shortage

Fri, 29 Aug 2025 15:39:12 GMT

On Thursday, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced the Rural Veterinary Shortage Action Plan that will expand the support available for rural veterinarians.

“Rural veterinarians are vital for the agricultural economy in the United States. Our farmers and ranchers rely on these critical services to prevent the transmission of animal disease, protect our food supply and support America’s rural economy,” said Rollins during a press conference at Mississippi State University’s College of Veterinary Medicine. “As the number of rural food animal veterinarians continues to decline, USDA is putting farmers first to ensure we build back our first line of defense in our animal food production system – the rural veterinarian.”

The plan aims to support veterinarians and protect livestock across rural communities by:

expanding grants and financial assistance
streamlining loan applications
investing in economic research to guide solutions
making federal service more attractive to veterinarians
recruiting more students from rural America into veterinary schools

Great to be in Starkville with @SenHydeSmith at @msstate’s College of Veterinary Medicine. Rural food animal veterinarians are essential to livestock health, disease prevention, and the strength of our rural economy, but their numbers are declining.

That’s why I’m announcing… pic.twitter.com/LUHwqviSQt
— Secretary Brooke Rollins (@SecRollins) August 28, 2025

Veterinarian Shortage

According to the AVMA , the number of companion animal veterinarians has increased by 22% over the past decade; however, the number of mixed animal and food animal veterinarians has decreased by 15%. Meanwhile, the national cattle inventory was only down 2.5 million head, or approximately 1%, in January 2025 compared with January 2015, as reported by the USDA’s National Agriculture Statistics Service . USDA has designated at least one rural area in nearly every state as having unmet veterinary needs.

Recent efforts to increase the number of rural veterinarians have included state and federal repayment programs, as well as program development at veterinary colleges to attract students. While these programs have been generally successful, they were not intended to comprehensively address the lack of veterinarians in rural areas.

Plan Details

The Rural Veterinary Shortage Action Plan encompasses five actions to address the challenge of the growing veterinarian shortage.

Enhance and streamline veterinary grant programs. The USDA will be making changes to the Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program and the Veterinary Services Grant Program to streamline applications and increase funding.
Analyze rural veterinary shortages to better understand the need. For improved Federal and State policy decisions, data on the scope of the rural veterinary shortage will be collected and analyzed by the USDA Economic Research Service.
Recruit and retain USDA veterinarians. The USDA will explore special pay rates, increased tuition reimbursements, and recruitments bonuses for federal veterinarians. They hope to make Federal service more attractive and create a direct pipeline into public service for veterinarians.
Catalog federal resources available to veterinarians for starting a practice. As opening a veterinary clinic in a rural area can be cost prohibitive, the USDA will catalog relevant programs (including rural development programs) to better inform veterinary schools and graduates.
Work with and listen to stakeholders, including veterinary schools, to understand the barriers to entry and increase recruitment from rural areas. Very few veterinary students come from rural backgrounds or express interest in production animal practice. Next month, the USDA will hold listening sessions with stakeholders to determine what additional actions can be taken to stimulate interest in rural veterinary practice.

Through this action plan, USDA hopes to address the rural veterinarian shortage, thus strengthening the ability to deal with animal health threats, foodborne illnesses and complex trade barriers as well as protecting the safety of the U.S. food supply chain.

U.S. Dairy Herd Continues to Grow: Fastest Pace in 17 Years

Mon, 25 Aug 2025 16:17:58 GMT

Last fall, after more than a year of low dairy cow cull rates, U.S. dairy producers started to rebuild the milk herd. So far this year, dairy producers have held cull rates low enough to add milk cows at the fastest rate since 2008, says Sarina Sharp, analyst with the Daily Dairy Report.

“While the heifer shortage has remained acute this year, today’s herd is the largest in four years, but it’s also growing older,” Sharp says. “To fill every stall, producers are holding on to cows for an extra lactation or keeping cows whose milk yields are lower than desired because not enough heifers exist to replace less-productive livestock.”

In late-September 2023, U.S. dairy producers began to rein in cull rates, sending fewer animals to packing plants. At first, the lighter slaughter volumes were not substantial enough to offset the ongoing heifer shortage, and the U.S. dairy herd declined. The herd continued to shrink until January 2024, but as producers continued to hold onto lower-end cows, the decline in U.S. milk cow numbers ended, and the national dairy herd began growing again last autumn, Sharp says.

“Now the trade is watching closely for any sign that cull rates are climbing, which would foster slower growth in milk cow counts” she says.

For the first time since March, USDA’s weekly slaughter volumes regularly topped 50,000 head in July, and in the last two weeks of the month, producers sent more cows to packing plants than they did a year earlier. At first glance, rising slaughter volumes appear to indicate the situation could be changing, but a deeper dive shows otherwise, according to Sharp.

“The increases in cull rates can easily be explained by seasonality, mathematics and weather,” she says. “First, cull rates typically jump in July following spring flush. And while U.S. dairy producers are now milking 146,000 more cows than a year ago, slaughter volumes can top last year’s very low counts without boosting culling percentages.”

Over the past two decades, she explains, dairy producers have typically culled about 32% of the milk cow herd each year. Last year, the cull rate dropped to 29.6%. This year, with 146,000 more cows, producers could continue to cull less than 30% of the herd and still send nearly 1,000 more cows to slaughter each week.

In addition, while slaughter in late July was unusually high in the Midwest, a derecho that slammed into the Central Plains was likely a major driver of the increase. USDA data showed that slaughter in the Midwest jumped 2,400 head above the prior year in the final week of July.

“Powerful winds damaged facilities and forced some producers to send cows to the packer while they repaired barns and milk parlors,” Sharp says. “Eventually, health and longevity will necessitate a return to historical cull rates, but for now, economics suggest slaughter volumes will remain near year-ago levels and expansion will continue, leading to strong milk production.”

Your Next Read:
Milk Production Soars: Record-Breaking Growth for Dairy Industry in Four Years

A Unique, Hands-On Approach to Training Tomorrow’s Dairy Veterinarians

Wed, 06 Aug 2025 19:34:28 GMT

Large animal veterinarians specializing in dairy have almost become the unicorns of the industry. In a space that is nearly dominated by small animal vets, finding young professionals interested in pursuing a dairy-focused practice has become increasingly rare. That’s why hands-on programs like the University of Vermont’s CREAM Program (Cooperative for Real Education in Agricultural Management), are playing a vital role in developing the next generation of dairy veterinarians.

Stephen Wadsworth, the current director of CREAM, brings more than four decades of dairy veterinary experience to the role. As a teacher for the Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, his background in private practice offers students a direct link between academic concepts and real-world applications in dairy herd management.

“The CREAM program was started in 1988 by an animal geneticist on faculty,” Wadsworth explains. “It’s a 60-cow tiestall, high-producing registered Holstein herd, currently averaging about 100 lb. per day, and it’s run almost exclusively by undergraduate animal science students, most of whom are pre-vet and have never even handled a dairy cow before.”

What began as a temporary teaching position in 2018 quickly became a full-time role that Wadsworth calls more rewarding than he ever expected. After four decades in a busy, six-person dairy practice in northwestern Vermont, he welcomed the opportunity to pass on his knowledge to those just entering the profession.

“Though I should be retired, it’s too much fun,” he says. “It’s been far more gratifying than I imagined.”

Beyond the Books: Learning by Doing
According to Wadsworth, the CREAM program offers more than just basic classroom learning. Students participate in every aspect of managing the university’s dairy herd, from milking and feeding to reproductive protocols and record-keeping. The immersive experience prepares them for future roles in veterinary school and beyond.

Currently, the program is divided into three core areas: academic instruction, work skill development, and community and personal growth.

“First, there’s lecture, about two and a half hours per week where I cover livestock medicine, herd health and management principles,” Wadsworth says. “Second is work skill development. Many of these students have never held jobs requiring punctuality or responsibility. So, they learn that when we say you have to be here at 3:30 a.m. for morning milking, it really means 3:20 a.m., or preferably 3:15 a.m. to set up the parlor.”

He adds that the third area, community and personal development, might be the most impactful.

“We talk about what it means to be a person of good character and how to work together in a group,” Wadsworth says, noting how the first few days learning how to operate a dairy is challenging for the students.

“You’ve got 20 students working together to milk 60 cows in a double-six parlor. Some days it’s like herding cats,” he laughs. “The first milking during the summer took seven hours, but now they’re down to an hour and a half. But in a few weeks, there’s this tight community and new friendships formed, and students leave the program saying it was the most transformative thing they’ve ever done in their life.”

While the program serves as a steppingstone for students applying to veterinary school, it often leads to a deeper transformation.

“Some students come in thinking this is just a box to check for their application,” Wadsworth says. “But many convert to being interested in a dairy practice. When they are accepted into vet school, many decide to pursue a career in dairy medicine as a result of their time here, which is gratifying beyond words.”

As the veterinary profession continues to evolve, programs like CREAM offer an essential on-ramp for students with little or no agricultural background.

“We know there isn’t necessarily a shortage of food animal veterinarians, but we do have geographic placement challenges,” Wadsworth says. “And fewer young people are growing up on farms. So, it’s vital to provide this kind of exposure to what dairy farming really looks like.”

That exposure includes full responsibility for the daily care of the UVM CREAM herd. Students handle all aspects of herd management, including milking three times per day as well as cleaning, feeding calves and administering medical treatments under guidance. Each student completes three to four chores weekly, one of which always includes the early morning milking. They’re also involved in calving, fresh cow and calf care, vaccinations and reproductive synchronization. Additionally, every student is assigned a specialty area and expected to keep the group informed on that topic throughout the program.

Wadsworth is careful to emphasize the skills students gain are universally applicable across herd sizes and management systems.

“If you understand the biology of a cow — the physiology of ketosis, reproduction and mastitis — those fundamentals apply whether you’re on a 60-cow tiestall or a 6,000-cow commercial dairy,” he says. “It may look different, but the principles are the same.”

To add to this experience, Wadsworth is currently organizing a six-farm tour for his students to further broaden their exposure to different dairy operations across northern Vermont.

“It gives them the opportunity to see firsthand how those principles scale and adapt,” he says. “The goal is to provide a strong foundation so they can walk into any herd and understand what’s happening.”

For students without previous large-animal experience, the smaller scale of the CREAM herd offers an ideal environment to build confidence and competence.

“You could argue that animal handling and husbandry are easier to learn in a 60-cow herd than a larger operation,” Wadsworth notes. “But here, they have more direct contact with the animals and more opportunities to take ownership of daily tasks. That kind of engagement really accelerates learning.”

For Wadsworth, transitioning from private practice to academia has brought a new and refreshing challenge.

“I feel privileged to be here,” he says. “Watching these students grow over the course of the program is something special.”

As the veterinary industry looks to the future, programs like CREAM are helping ensure the next generation of dairy veterinarians are equipped with knowledge, hands-on experience and respect for the work ahead.

To learn more about UVM’s CREAM Program, watch here:

Could EPA Decision Signal The Beginning Of The End For DEF?

Thu, 31 Jul 2025 16:27:17 GMT

Mike Berdo has strong words to describe his ongoing experiences using machinery requiring DEF ( Diesel Exhaust Fluid ) on his southeast Iowa farm.

“It has been an absolute nightmare, at least for us. Mechanics make trip after trip to do little stuff that’s very expensive to fix,” said Berdo, who produces grain and beef cattle near Washington. “We had planting delays last spring … little stuff that came from it and just seemed like [an issue to deal with] day after day.”

The ongoing mechanical issues and costs are why Berdo said he is “all for” EPA rescinding the 2009 Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding. The Finding has enabled the agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under Section 202 of the Clean Air Act and, in recent years, and launch requirements such as the use of DEF systems in diesel-powered engines.

EPA Draws A Line In The Sand
On Tuesday, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin released a proposal to rescind the 2009 Finding.

If finalized, the proposal would remove all greenhouse gas standards for light-, medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and heavy-duty engines, EPA said in a follow-up press release .

The move would start with EPA’s first greenhouse gas standard set in 2010 for light-duty vehicles and those set in 2011 for medium-duty vehicles and heavy-duty vehicles and engines.

EPA said the proposal is expected to “save Americans $54 billion in costs annually through the repeal of all greenhouse gas standards, including the Biden EPA’s electric vehicle mandate, under conservative economic forecasts.”

Zeldin made the announcement to rescind the Finding in Indiana, alongside Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and called it the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history.

What The Decision Could Mean To Farmers
Specific to U.S. farmers, the proposal could potentially result in DEF systems no longer being included on new tractors and other heavy equipment using diesel-powered engines, said Chip Flory, host of AgriTalk, during a Farmer Forum discussion on Wednesday.

South Dakota farmer Ryan Wagner told Flory he has a wait-and-see perspective on how or whether the EPA proposal goes into effect. He anticipates that reversing the Finding will take considerable time and effort for EPA to implement.

“It took a long time with the interim engines and things to get into full DEF in the first place,” Wagner said. “I don’t know how long it would take to unwind all that and how quickly manufacturing will just take those systems right off, but it’ll be interesting to see what happens.”

To Wagner’s point, here’s a brief look back at some timing showing when DEF rolled out in agriculture and nonroad equipment and became mandatory . The regulations were phased in over several years based on the type of equipment and engine size:

2008: DEF became required for all new diesel engines with engine sizes over 750 horsepower.

2011: the regulations expanded to include equipment with engine sizes between 175-750 horsepower.

By 2015, all new nonroad diesel engines were required to be Tier 4 compliant and utilize DEF, regardless of equipment type or engine size.

As Wagner considers DEF, he noted its use in diesel engines has provided him with one benefit: “On the plus side, I do like that they don’t make the walls of my shop black. That’s been nice,” he said. “You can run them inside for a short time and not not feel like you’re breathing in a bunch of soot and making everything black.”

Expect Legal Challenges To EPA Decision
A number of environmental groups have already blasted the move by EPA, saying it spells the end of the road for U.S. action against climate change, according to an online article by Reuters .

Legal challenges from various environmental groups, states and lawyers are likely ahead.

That fact wasn’t lost on Flory and the Farmer Forum participants during the AgriTalk discussion on Wednesday.

“If this proposal is finalized, it’s going to start a lot of conversations … and the dominoes are going to start to fall, something that we need to keep track of, no doubt,” Flory said. You can hear the complete Farmer Forum discussion on AgriTalk here:

EPA will initiate a public comment period to solicit input. Further information on the public comment process and instructions for participation will be published in the Federal Register and on the EPA website .

Your next read: Right To Repair Granted? John Deere Launches Digital Self-Repair Tool for $195 Per Tractor

What Americans Won’t Give Up in 2025: Spending Priorities Revealed

Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:11:02 GMT

In the face of persistent inflation and tighter household budgets, Americans are making it clear where they refuse to cut corners.

According to a SensaPay study that analyzed spending behavior, inflation data and consumer sentiment, fresh produce emerged as the top-ranked category in consumer resilience. Meat and dairy tied for the second spot.

The study outlines what Americans are valuing most and why, and the findings reflect a cultural shift in what Americans now see as worth preserving, despite cost.

SensaPay shows that fresh produce tops its 2025 “spending-resilience” ranking with a score of 34.7. Households are purchasing fruit and vegetables roughly four times a month, and year-on-year inflation has cooled to just 0.9 percent. The big driver, though, is sentiment, says a SensaPay rep: “We see a net-intent reading of +15 points, meaning far more shoppers plan to maintain or raise produce spend than to cut it. As I note in the analysis, when inflation slipped under one percent, intent to keep, or even grow, production spending jumped 12 points almost overnight; price relief shows up first where freshness is most visible.”

Meat and dairy sit close behind with a resilience score of 27.6, the study shows. Consumers are still purchasing protein about four times a month, SensaPay says, but they’re navigating higher inflation roughly seven percent year-over-year by trading cuts and brands rather than trimming volume. Net intent remains a solid +13 points. “Protein inflation hasn’t eased as quickly, but omnichannel promotions let households stretch the category; price sensitivity shows up in switching cuts, not skipping,” the rep says.

Fresh Produce

Regardless of modest inflation at less than 1% year over year, fresh produce tops the list of categories U.S. consumers won’t give up. Its high resilience score is driven by strong purchase intent, frequency of shopping trips and its perceived essentiality in everyday meals, the study shows. As shoppers become more selective, they’re doubling down on foods that deliver both health benefits and value. Fruits and vegetables aren’t just nutritional staples, as they’re increasingly seen as foundational to personal wellness, family meals and cost-effective cooking.

“Produce wins the resilience race because it rides the strongest cultural current of all: America’s healthy-eating movement,” a rep from SensaPay says. “From school lunch norms to TikTok ‘fridge-restock’ videos, fresh fruit and veg have become status markers of well-being. Shoppers tell us, ‘If I’m going to spend more anywhere, it should be on what keeps my family healthy.’ That mind-set—plus sub-1 % inflation—makes produce the one category consumers refuse to trim.”

Retailers and growers alike can take heart: Produce is no longer just a side dish; it’s central to how consumers define health and quality of life in 2025. This prioritization opens the door for creative merchandising, meal-planning partnerships and continued investment in quality, freshness and storytelling around seasonal and local offerings. In a landscape of economic uncertainty, the produce aisle remains one place where shoppers continue to say “yes.”

1 of 4:

Data: SensaPay

2 of 4:

Data: SensaPay

3 of 4:

Data: SensaPay

4 of 4:

Data: SensaPay

Dairy

Despite higher grocery prices, many consumers are not willing to cut back on dairy. A growing nationwide protein craze has been a big push behind this. With more people focusing on health and wellness and embracing the “Make America Healthy Again” movement, dairy has been a natural fit behind this trend, with it being a tasty and convenient source of high-quality protein and nutrition.

In addition, dairy is a staple in many consumers’ favorite meals and recipes. From milk and cheese to yogurt and cottage cheese, its versatility makes it hard to replace in the kitchen. As a familiar ingredient found in everything from casseroles and soups to baked goods and family dishes, it remains a constant item on the shopping list.

Beef and Pork

According to the SensaPay study, consumers are not backing off on purchasing meat and dairy products. Despite inflation, the intent to purchase remains high with a necessity level at 1.

At a recent Idaho Cattle Association meeting, a panel of consumers not involved in the agriculture industry indicated that beef prices were not deterring them from buying beef. They noted the prices of all groceries and goods were up due to inflation.

The pork industry is trying to capitalize on the desire for protein in diets with its new campaign, “ Taste What Pork Can Do ,” which puts the flavor and diversity of using pork products on display.

“It’s really important to remember the U.S. public wants meat protein,” says Glynn Tonsor, Kansas State University livestock economist. “There are a lot of signs. We are in a pro protein environment . I don’t think there are issues. I actually think there is a celebration about the taste and the eating experience and so forth for all the major proteins.”

According to a SensaPay study that analyzed spending behavior, inflation data and consumer sentiment, fresh produce emerged as the top-ranked category in consumer resilience, followed by meat and dairy. (Data courtesy of SensaPay)

How the Trending #FarmGirlSummer Is Educating Viewers About Rural Living

Mon, 21 Jul 2025 20:13:29 GMT

Sporting dirty boots and a deep-rooted love for the land, a new wave of female farmers is making waves on social media under the trending hashtag #FarmGirlSummer. Step beyond the sunsets and tractor selfies, and this viral movement is offering something deeper: a window into the real day-to-day of agricultural life.

The Packer spoke with four influencers who are using their platforms to share more than just aesthetic glimpses — they’re educating followers about rural realities, farm work and what it truly means to live off the land.

Miranda Neville and her husband, Douglas, are dairy farmers in Pennsylvania on his family farm.

(Photo courtesy of Miranda Neville)

Miranda Neville, Dairy Farmer

I want others to see my content and know that even though we work long, tiring days, it’s still important to make time for the things we enjoy.

Miranda Neville and her husband, Douglas, are dairy farmers in Pennsylvania on his family farm. In addition to farming, she also works an off-farm job in agricultural conservation, while balancing family life. Neville says she enjoys sharing her life on the farm on social media and all of the joyful chaos that comes with it.

The Packer: What does #FarmGirlSummer mean to you personally?

Neville: There is rarely a slow day living on a farm, especially if you have livestock. For me, #FarmGirlSummer is about finding the peaceful moments during the busiest time of year. Some examples of that might look like unloading hay in the summer heat but then watching animals graze on the lush, green pasture. Showing dairy cattle at county fairs while making memories that will last a lifetime with friends. Working tirelessly to get crops planted but making time to deliver meals to the field and having a sunset ride in the tractor. Farming can be difficult, so #FarmGirlSummer is about romanticizing my life while doing farm chores and appreciating the land that surrounds me.

How do you think social media is shaping the way people see farm life or rural living?

Historically, there have been so many misconceptions about farmers and ‘country life.’ With social media, we are able to show firsthand what we do and why we do it. Yes, it’s a simpler life — in that we aren’t living in a busy city and bustling traffic— but we work long, hard days to improve the lives of our families, our livestock and crops. We are able to share ideas, educate and build connections with so many different people from all walks of life. It’s giving a voice to farm life and rural living in a way that has been limited in the past.

What message or feeling are you trying to share when you post with #FarmGirlSummer?

Through my social media, I show the realities and struggles of life on our dairy farm, but I also try to focus on the most beautiful parts of farm life — particularly in the summer. I want others to see my content and know that even though we work long, tiring days, it’s still important to make time for the things we enjoy.
Follow Miranda: Tiktok (Miranda.neville); Instagram (Miranda.neville1)

Erica Loesel balances a career as an oncology nurse with Michigan farming.

(Photo courtesy of Erica Loesel)

Erica Loesel, FarmHer

Even if the photos are pretty, the message is: this is real. Real effort. Real life. Real beauty in the mess and the mud and the moments between.

Erica Loesel balances a career as an oncology nurse with Michigan farming.

The Packer: What does #FarmGirlSummer mean to you personally?

Loesel: For me, #FarmGirlSummer evokes a vivid, grounded kind of freedom. It’s not just a hashtag — it feels like a celebration of hands-in-the-dirt simplicity, sun-kissed days and a deeper connection to the land and hard work.

Personally, it looks like:

Early mornings with dew on the fields and coffee steaming in a Yeti cup.
Cutoff jeans, dusty boots and tan lines from hours in the sun.
Quiet, golden sunsets after long, labor-heavy days — and a satisfaction that city summers just don’t offer.

It’s about living a little slower, working a little harder and feeling a whole lot more connected to what matters.

How do you think social media is shaping the way people see farm life or rural living?

Social media is massively reshaping how people perceive farm life and rural living.

By romanticizing the rural lifestyle, platforms like Instagram and TikTok have popularized the ‘aesthetic’ of farm life — think slow mornings, tractor rides, sunsets over fields of gold. It’s drawing people into appreciating a simpler, more grounded way of living.

Visibility and connection. Farmers, especially women and younger people, are sharing real stories and daily routines, creating communities and challenging outdated stereotypes (like the idea that farming is only for older men or men in general).

And through education and awareness, audiences get to see how food is grown, the labor involved and the realities of sustainable or ethical agriculture. It helps bridge the urban-rural disconnect.

What message or feeling are you trying to share when you post with #FarmGirlSummer?

When I post with #FarmGirlSummer, the message I’m trying to share is a blend of realness and reverence — a celebration of resilience, connection to the land and the gritty joy that comes from a life rooted in tradition.

Here’s what I hope comes across:

Grounded joy: Not everything is picture-perfect — there’s sweat, dirt and sometimes hard days — but there’s real joy in that. A joy that comes from doing something meaningful with your hands and heart.

Empowerment: #FarmGirlSummer isn’t about being delicate or curated — it’s about being strong, capable and unafraid to show up exactly as you are, whether you’re driving tractors or making homemade jam. It’s femininity without fragility.

Simplicity with soul: It’s about slow mornings, honest work and choosing presence over polish. It’s a lifestyle, not a filter.

Authenticity over aesthetic: Even if the photos are pretty, the message is: This is real. Real effort. Real life. Real beauty in the mess and the mud and the moments between.

In short, it’s not just “look at this cute farm outfit,” it’s “here’s what it means to live close to the earth, close to the truth and be dang proud of it.”

Follow Erica on TikTok (thecodebluefarmher)

Anne Sneller lives in Earlham, Iowa with her husband, John, and 11-year-old son.

(Photo courtesy of Anne Sneller)

Anne Sneller, Ag Advocate

I am passionate about advocating for agriculture and the opportunities 4-H and FFA offer youth and the skills they can learn from participating.

Anne Sneller lives in Earlham, Iowa. She works as a fraud and claims operations senior manager for Wells Fargo, leads a 4-H club of 75 members called Penn Prize Winners, and is also active supporting FFA, from mentoring members to judging contests at State FFA. Her husband, John, and she have an 11-year-old son who shows pigs and goats.

The Packer: What does #FarmGirlSummer mean to you personally?

Sneller: #FarmGirlSummer to me is helping my son with his show livestock, running on the pavement and gravel roads of Madison County, enjoying the agriculture, helping on my family’s cattle and row crop farm, and fishing and four-wheeling with my son any chance we get.

I am passionate about advocating for agriculture and the opportunities 4-H and FFA offer youth and the skills they can learn from participating.

Follow Anne on TikTok (chasingthatrunnershigh)

At home, you’ll find Topanga Dailey raising her 8-month-old son Owen while helping her husband farm wheat, soybeans and milo in McPherson, Kans.

(Photo courtesy of Topanga Dailey)

Topanga Dailey, Farmer

It’s a reminder — to myself, my family and my community — that life is bigger than your newsfeed. It’s proof that I’ve stepped away from the trap of constant scrolling and hopefully encourages others to slow down, take a breath and enjoy the moment.

Topanga Dailey is a senior digital marketing specialist. At home, you’ll find her raising her 8-month-old son Owen while helping her husband farm wheat, soybeans and milo in McPherson, Kans.

The Packer: What does #FarmGirlSummer mean to you personally?

Dailey: To me, #FarmGirlSummer is a conscious choice to be more in touch with the real world — making things from scratch, getting soil under your fingernails, embracing natural materials, wearing less makeup, stepping away from screens and reconnecting with what real work looks and feels like. Life can feel stressful, exhausting and even scary when you’re glued to a computer all day. The farm reminds you that life moves in seasons — some good, some hard — and that things take time and nothing is permanent.

How do you think social media is shaping the way people see farm life or rural living?

Social media has helped romanticize the farm. #FarmGirlSummer is one of the latest “vibes” people are chasing — a form of escapism and a search for meaning in what can feel like an overwhelming world. Now, people can see farms and rural life right from their phones and reframe what was once seen as an undesirable lifestyle into something idyllic — especially for those feeling overstimulated by city life. Rural living is naturally beautiful and social media has made it easier than ever to show just how special it is.

What message or feeling are you trying to share when you post with #FarmGirlSummer?

It’s a reminder — to myself, my family and my community — that life is bigger than your feed. It’s proof that I’ve stepped away from the trap of constant scrolling and hopefully encourages others to slow down, take a breath and enjoy the moment. Farm life offers that shift in perspective perfectly.

Follow Topanga on Instagram (reallifetopangadailey).

Rural America is Facing a Mounting Labor Crisis

Fri, 11 Jul 2025 21:01:26 GMT

The American labor market is reaching a critical turning point that could tighten labor availability in rural industries and slow growth across the U.S. economy. A new quarterly report from CoBank’s Knowledge Exchange warns that demographic shifts and recent policy changes may start impacting businesses as soon as late 2025.

From livestock and crop operations to food processors and rural cooperatives, this labor shortage is becoming especially noticeable in the heart of America’s farmland. Many producers are already struggling to fill roles, and the challenge is expected to intensify in the coming months.

“Barring an unforeseen change in labor force participation rates or immigration policies, the pool of available workers is set to shrink sharply in the next few years,” says Rob Fox, director of CoBank’s Knowledge Exchange. “The problem will be even more serious in states with slower population growth in the Upper Midwest, Corn Belt and Central Plains.”

Demographic Pressures Mount

Fox says the warning signs have been building for years. Labor force participation has steadily declined, birth rates have dropped and immigration policy has become more restrictive.

Between 2022 and 2024, nearly 9 million immigrants arrived in the U.S., driven by global humanitarian crises and relaxed federal rules. While that influx temporarily eased labor constraints, Fox says it only masked deeper, long-term trends.

U.S. fertility rates have fallen from 2.12 children per woman in 2007 to 1.62 in 2023, meaning fewer young people are entering the workforce just as the last of the baby boomers retire. In addition, labor force participation has slipped from a peak of 67% in 2000 to 62% today. Nearly 2.5 million working-age Americans have left the labor force in the past eight months alone.

“There is no single reason people are stepping away,” Fox explains. “It’s a combination of rising caregiving responsibilities, job skill mismatches, mental health challenges and higher disability rates. These are complex issues that won’t be resolved overnight.”

Shrinking Workforce Hits Agriculture Hard

The effects are already being felt across rural America. Farms, food processors, equipment dealers and cooperatives are struggling to find and keep the workers they need to maintain daily operations. Seasonal labor has become harder to find and full-time positions, especially those requiring specialized skills or long hours, are increasingly difficult to fill.

In regions with slower population growth, such as the upper Midwest and central Plains, the challenge is even more acute. These areas often lack the population inflows that help offset workforce losses elsewhere in the country.

While labor has been tight for several years, Fox warns that conditions are poised to deteriorate further.

“What we are facing is not just a cyclical labor issue; it’s a structural one,” he says.

Border encounters have dropped sharply since August 2024, signaling a steep decline in immigration. Combined with rising political pressure to increase deportations, the agricultural labor pool could shrink even more in the months ahead.

“Immigration has long been a key pillar supporting the rural workforce,” Fox notes. “Without a steady flow of new workers, farms and agribusinesses will have to get creative, either by increasing wages, automating tasks or changing how they manage production.”

Technology Offers a Path Forward

In response, more agricultural businesses are turning to technology to help offset the labor gap.

“The key to addressing labor scarcity always lies in innovation,” Fox says. “AI and robotics are no longer limited to the factory floor. They are increasingly being used in fields, dairies and food plants.”

A recent Gallup poll found that nearly one in five workers already uses artificial intelligence in some form each week. At the same time, the cost of robotics has dropped by nearly half in the past decade, making automation more accessible for a broader range of farms and agribusinesses.

CoBank’s report notes that many farm supply customers are using new tools to increase efficiency, improve decision-making and free up time for employees to focus on higher-value responsibilities.

Planning for What Comes Next

As producers look toward 2026, a combination of labor constraints, volatile input costs and shifting policy landscapes will continue to shape decision-making. Fox thinks adaptability will be essential.

“Technology will be critical to agriculture’s future,” he says. “AI and robotics can help farmers do more with fewer workers, boosting efficiency and margins. But investment decisions must be made carefully, especially in this uncertain economic environment.”

Until clearer policies emerge on trade, labor and energy, rural America will need to prepare for continued pressure.

“This is a pivotal moment,” Fox concludes. “Farms that plan ahead, embrace innovation and stay flexible will be best positioned to succeed.”

Breaking: Mexican Border Closed Again as New World Screwworm Comes Within 370 Miles of the U.S.

Thu, 10 Jul 2025 02:18:05 GMT

On July 8, Mexico’s National Service of Agro-Alimentary Health, Safety and Quality reported a new case of New World screwworm (NWS) in Ixhuatlan de Madero, Veracruz, Mexico, which is approximately 160 miles northward of the current sterile fly dispersal grid on the eastern side of the country and 370 miles south of the U.S./Mexico border.

This new northward detection comes approximately two months after northern detections were reported in Oaxaca and Veracruz, less than 700 miles away from the U.S. border, which triggered the closure of our ports to Mexican cattle, bison and horses on May 11, 2025 .

While USDA announced a risk-based phased port re-opening strategy for cattle, bison and equine from Mexico beginning as early as July 7, 2025 , this newly reported NWS case raises significant concern about the previously information shared by Mexican officials and severely compromises the outlined port reopening schedule of five ports from July 7 to Sept. 15. Therefore, in order to protect American livestock and the U.S. food supply, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins has ordered the closure of livestock trade through southern ports of entry effective immediately.

“The United States has promised to be vigilant — and after detecting this new NWS case, we are pausing the planned port reopening’s to further quarantine and target this deadly pest in Mexico. We must see additional progress combatting NWS in Veracruz and other nearby Mexican states in order to reopen livestock ports along the Southern border,” Rollins says. “Thanks to the aggressive monitoring by USDA staff in the U.S. and in Mexico, we have been able to take quick and decisive action to respond to the spread of this deadly pest.”

To ensure the protection of U.S. livestock herds, USDA is holding Mexico accountable by ensuring proactive measures are being taken to maintain a NWS free barrier. This is maintained with stringent animal movement controls, surveillance, trapping and following the proven science to push the NWS barrier south in phases as quickly as possible.

In June, Secretary Rollins launched a 5-point plan to combat NWS by protecting our border at all costs, increasing eradication efforts in Mexico, and increasing readiness. USDA also announced the groundbreaking of a sterile fly dispersal facility in South Texas. This facility will provide a critical contingency capability to disperse sterile flies should a NWS detection be made in the Southern U.S.

Simultaneously, USDA is moving forward with the design process to build a domestic sterile fly production facility to ensure it has the resources to push NWS back to the Darien Gap. USDA is working on these efforts in lockstep with border states – Arizona, New Mexico and Texas – as it will take a coordinated approach with federal, state and local partners to keep this pest at bay and out of the U.S.

USDA will continue to have personnel perform site visits throughout Mexico to ensure the Mexican government has adequate protocols and surveillance in place to combat this pest effectively and efficiently.

Click to enlarge.

(USDA)

Your Next Read: Protect Your Livestock: Signs of New World Screwworm

Are Beef-on-Dairy Animals Really Worth the High Price Tag?

Fri, 27 Jun 2025 21:25:43 GMT

Beef-on-dairy calves are no longer just a trend; they’re a business strategy for producers aiming to squeeze more value out of every breeding decision. For dairy farmers, they offer a way to turn lower-producing cows into a new revenue stream. For feedlots, they promise improved feed efficiency and more desirable carcasses.

“Dairy producers are breeding lower milk production cows to beef sires to increase calf revenue,” says Melanie Concepcion, a Ph.D. student at Michigan State University, who recently presented on the economics of beef-on-dairy animals. “The idea is to add more value to existing Holstein calves by improving muscling, hide quality and market desirability.”

According to CattleFax, beef-on-dairy crosses started showing up in the fed slaughter mix around 2019. Today, they represent an estimated 2 million to 3 million head annually, contributing roughly 15% to 20% of total U.S. beef production and signaling a major shift in how dairy genetics can serve the beef supply chain.

“They’re here to stay,” Concepcion adds. “And the number of beef-on-dairy cattle is only expected to grow.”

Study 1: Feedlot Gains and Carcass Traits
To measure how these crossbreds stack up, Concepcion launched a study evaluating 75 Holstein and 75 beef-on-Holstein steers from Michigan calf raisers. Raised under identical conditions, the steers transitioned from starter to finishing diets and the performance differences were not surprising.

Beef-on-dairy steers:

Reached market weight 21 days faster
Converted feed more efficiently
Posted a 20% larger ribeye area
Scored lower yield grades, signaling better muscling

“They’re more feed efficient and have a greater ribeye area and fat thickness than the Holsteins,” Concepcion explains. “Their yield grade is also lower, which is a good thing because it means more yield and muscling.”

However, liver health raises red flags. Concepcion finds that 39% of the beef-on-Holstein steers develop liver abscesses, some severe enough to adhere the liver to the carcass.

“In those cases, you see trimming losses,” she says. “And that hurts overall carcass value.”

Premiums and Pitfalls: Are Crossbreds Priced Right?
Economically, the study shows that beef-on-dairy calves bring greater value but also come with a price tag that’s tough to justify.

“We pay $310 more per calf for the beef-on-Holsteins, but our data shows we should have only paid $273 more,” Concepcion says. “Yes, they should be worth more, but not as much as we paid.”

With some day-old beef on dairy crossbreds fetching upward of $1,000, Concepcion says the numbers simply don’t justify the premium in many cases.

“These calves clearly have more value than Holsteins, but not to the degree that some buyers are currently paying,” she says. “We’re still seeing inflated calf prices that don’t reflect actual feedlot performance or carcass returns.”

Study 2: Corn Silage and Liver Health
Looking to address liver concerns, Concepcion led a second study focusing on dietary fiber. The hypothesis: increasing corn silage in the finishing ration could help reduce liver abscess incidence by supporting better rumen health.

The study included 65 Holstein and 65 beef-on-Holstein steers. Each breed was fed a finishing diet with either 20% or 40% corn silage.

“We wanted to see if increasing fiber through higher corn silage inclusion reduces abscess rates,” she says.

The findings were clear:

Steers on the 40% corn silage diet had significantly fewer liver abscesses
The diet change did not affect feed efficiency or cost of gain
Beef-on-dairy steers continued to outperform Holsteins in carcass traits, regardless of diet

“Increasing corn silage inclusion effectively reduces the amount of liver abscesses in cattle, regardless of breed,” Concepcion says.

Carcass Performance Remains Strong
Even with the shift in diet, beef-on-Holstein steers continue to demonstrate a clear advantage in carcass traits and processing yield compared to purebred dairy steers. These crossbreds exhibit:

Higher hot carcass weights
Greater dressing percentages
Larger ribeye areas
Lower kidney, pelvic and heart (KPH) fat

“Adding beef genetics to Holsteins results in more muscling,” Concepcion notes. “And that leads to higher carcass value.”

Interestingly, marbling and quality grade remain similar between breeds and diets. Most cattle grade in the low to mid-choice range, offering acceptable quality without excessive feed costs. Additionally, the lower KPH fat and higher dressing percentages give processors more saleable product, further boosting the overall economic benefit.

“Even with differences in feed and frame size, beef-on-dairy cattle continue to show consistency in carcass composition,” she adds. “This predictability is valuable for both feeders and packers.”

Feedlot Advantages Might Not Justify Current Calf Prices
Despite the performance benefits, the pricing issue resurfaces. In the second trial, beef-on-Holstein calves cost Concepcion $353 more than Holsteins, but break-even data shows they should only cost $281 more.

“We overpaid again, just like last time,” Concepcion says. “These studies show us that beef-on-dairy calves should be priced at a premium, but not as high as the current market suggests.”

Feed costs were actually lower for beef-on-dairy steers, thanks to shorter days on feed. And while the 40% corn silage diet increased feed cost slightly, it didn’t impact the cost of gain, making it a viable strategy for improving liver health without compromising efficiency.

Looking Ahead
While beef-on-dairy calves offer clear advantages in feedlot performance and carcass quality, Concepcion notes the market still needs tools to match pricing with actual value.

She continues to explore what drives health, gain and grading in these crossbreds, and her latest work includes studies on gut and liver health as well as comparisons across breed types like Simmental-Angus, Holstein and beef steers.

“The more we understand how these cattle grow, grade and ultimately eat, the better we can manage and market them,” she adds.

Your Next Read: How to Keep Good Hay From Going Bad: Barn Storage Tips That Protect its Quality and Value

To watch Cocepcion’s full webinar, click here:

The Best Time to Start Your Retirement Plan

Mon, 09 Jun 2025 19:35:34 GMT

Farmers historically have struggled to invest money in anything other than their farm operation. However, by investing in retirement plans including an IRA, a farmer can more easily save up for retirement and make the transfer to the next generation much easier.

The power of compounding is the financial seventh wonder of the world. Based on your annual investment return, you can determine how quickly your investment will double by dividing it into 72. For example, if you average 3% on your money, it will take 24 years to double. However, if you can earn 8%, then it only takes nine years.

The younger you start to invest, even small sums, the more money you will have at retirement. Let’s compare the results of placing $10,000 into a retirement account at either age 20 or 40.

The farmer who does this at age 40 and then pulls the money out at age 70 will have $100,627. However, the farmer who starts at age 20 will have $469,016, and if they can earn 10%, will have $1,173,909.

The cost of maintaining a solo 401k plan is very inexpensive and married couples can set aside at least $14,000 into an IRA each year. The fees on those accounts are minimal and you can make sure to invest in low-cost ETFs or mutual funds. High-cost funds could quickly reduce your returns substantially.

Most of the earnings will result in the last 10 years, so the sooner you get started, the more funds you will accumulate.

Risk Protection Benefits
There’s another big reason to make this investment. Funds in a retirement plan are fully exempt from bankruptcy, and we all know farming can be a very risky business. The full exemption does not apply to IRAs, but the amount that is exempt is fairly large.

This amount gets updated every three years. On April 1, 2025, the exemption amount was raised from $1,512,350 to $1,711.975 through March 31, 2028.

Most farmers have IRAs less than this amount, so it’s likely they will have a full exclusion if bankruptcy was to occur. Amounts rolled over from a 401k plan or other retirement account, including earnings associated on that account, are fully exempt.

In some states, IRAs are fully exempt or at least partially exempt.

The bottom line is to invest in an IRA or retirement plan. I hope you never need the protection, but it is a good insurance policy.

Dairy Heifer and Calf Values Remain in the Stratosphere

Thu, 05 Jun 2025 17:10:21 GMT

Prices for dairy replacement heifers and beef-cross calves remain out of this world, with both springers and newborn calves reaching astronomical levels. Holstein springers topped out in May at $4,200 per head in Pipestone, Minn., and newborn beef cross calves exceeded $1,600 per head in Wisconsin. How far and long this launch into record territory will last remains to be seen, but beef-cross breeding will continue to make a big bang in the markets for the foreseeable future.

According to the National Association of Animal Breeders , more than 81% of beef semen sold in the U.S. in 2024 was purchased by dairies, and USDA estimates predict the inventory of U.S. dairy heifers over 500 pounds will be the lowest ever recorded.

Your Next Read: The Hidden Cost of Heat Stress on the Unborn Calf

A Big Step Toward Better Milk Options for Kids

Tue, 03 Jun 2025 21:54:41 GMT

The Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry took a key step toward expanding milk choices in schools today, advancing the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act by voice vote. The bipartisan legislation, which has already cleared a House committee, would allow schools to once again offer whole and 2% milk, options currently excluded under federal school meal rules in place since 2012.

The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) applauded the committee’s action, calling it a crucial move toward improving childhood nutrition and giving schools greater flexibility to serve nutrient-dense dairy products.

“The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act is about making informed, science-backed decisions that prioritize the health and future of our children,” says Gregg Doud, NMPF president and CEO. “We’re grateful that this common-sense legislation has received such strong support from both sides of the aisle.”

The bipartisan bill, sponsored by Sens. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., Peter Welch, D-Vt., Dave McCormick, R-Pa., and John Fetterman, D-Pa., would give schools the option to serve whole and 2% milk — choices that are currently not allowed under federal school meal guidelines established in 2012. Those rules restrict milk offerings to 1% and fat-free varieties.

If enacted, the legislation would mark a significant shift in school nutrition policy. Whole and 2% milk are the most commonly consumed varieties at home and have been shown to be more satiating for children while still delivering the same 13 essential nutrients, including calcium, vitamin D and high-quality protein.

“Passing the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act will allow more schoolkids to access essential nutrients in their diets, and that’s something everyone can get behind,” Doud adds.

Support for the legislation extends beyond the dairy sector. The American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) also welcomed the committee’s action.

“Farm Bureau appreciates the Senate Agriculture Committee’s markup and passage of the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act,” says Zippy Duvall, AFBF president. “This bipartisan legislation will allow schools to offer additional nutritious milk varieties to students. Whole and 2% milk, as well as flavored options, are wholesome choices for children and an important building block for a healthy, balanced diet.”

The legislation is rooted in efforts to address declining milk consumption in schools. Since the removal of whole and reduced-fat milk from school menus more than a decade ago, overall milk intake among students has dropped. Advocates say reintroducing these options could help reverse that trend, especially at a time when nearly 90% of Americans fall short of recommended dairy intake levels.

“By offering milk options that align with both modern nutritional research and student preferences, schools can increase milk intake at a critical time,” Duvall says.

The House of Representatives is also considering companion legislation, led by House Agriculture Committee Chairman GT Thompson, R-Pa., and Rep. Kim Schrier, D-Wash. That version passed out of the House Education and the Workforce Committee with bipartisan support earlier this year and now awaits floor action. A similar bill cleared the full House in 2023 but failed to reach the Senate floor before the session ended.

With momentum now building in both chambers, dairy organizations are urging lawmakers to bring the bill to a final vote. The National Milk Producers Federation continues to call on dairy advocates to contact their representatives and push for the bill’s passage.

Your Next Read: New Federal Milk Marketing Order Reforms Take Effect

Navigate the Unpredictable Waters of the Year Ahead

Tue, 03 Jun 2025 13:00:00 GMT

Global Dairy Dynamics

Strong pricing in Europe and New Zealand created openings for U.S. dairy products to move out of the country without requiring significant downward price movement. Cheese exports increased by 22 million pounds in January and February, up 16%. Meanwhile, in the first quarter, CME spot block cheddar prices averaged $1.81 per pound, up 20% from the same period last year. That’s a win. The butter story has similarities. Exports increased by more than 8 million pounds in January and February, an 84% increase. CME spot prices were lower in the first quarter but not in a devastating fashion.

Prevailing price gaps favor more movement in the months ahead, with U.S. cheese and butter trading at large enough discounts to keep the purchase orders rolling.

Potential Trade War Tensions

An unfolding trade war potentially complicates things, of course. We don’t know how the story will end. Mexico is the pivotal player for cheese and nonfat dry milk. If things don’t get ugly, that will go a long way toward steadying the price boat. South Korea and Japan are also important players in the cheese arena. China looks like it’s going to be a sore spot, with major implications for the U.S. whey complex. A significant portion of U.S. whey, permeate and lactose exports move into China. If tariffs remain high, market prices could struggle, dinging other solids values in U.S. producer milk checks.

A Cautious Approach to Heifer Demand

The other big story for 2025 (and beyond) also features many moving pieces and unknowns. When will we begin to see replacement heifer availability turnaround? Beef-on-dairy breeding has become so widespread that we’ve run down dairy heifer inventories. At face value, the incentives continue to point in that direction. High beef prices and low cattle numbers keep pushing up the value for day-old dairy cross beef calves. The bird in hand, a $900 check for a day-old animal, sure seems to be more appealing than the two in the bush.

Yet, we wonder if more producers are starting to zag while everyone else is zigging? Are they backing off beef on dairy to ensure their ability to grow their own operations? Are some shifting breeding even a little, betting the potential rewards for raising dairy heifers are worth the risks?

The conversation is as fascinating as it is consequential, but it will be some time before we know if, and how much, the trend is shifting.

This is the 2025 dairy industry. Short on certainty. Long on volatility. Sharp management is more crucial than ever.

7 Health Insurance Solutions for the Self-Employed

Fri, 30 May 2025 15:59:38 GMT

If there is anything that could derail your business literally overnight, it’s a serious injury or illness in your family.

That’s why health insurance is an absolutely critical risk management tool, even though the cost of the insurance itself can also strain your business. While it probably won’t cover every medical expense for your family, it can protect you from the catastrophic effects of a major health event.

The majority of farm families agree with that sentiment, according to a 2017 study by HIREDnAG. The survey of nearly 1,000 farm families in 10 rural states found more than 75% of the respondents viewed health insurance as an essential risk management tool.

At the same time, however, many farm families still roll the dice by going without health insurance. The most recent USDA data on the subject shows more than 10% of U.S. farm households do not have health insurance, which is slightly higher than the general public. But even more telling is the type of farms that forgo it the most: dairy farms. They made up more than 40% of all farm households without health insurance, which is more than double any other type of farming enterprise.

Options to Cover Your Family

For those who are insured, many farm families rely on off-farm employment to secure health insurance — about 56% according to the USDA data. But what options are available for the rest of the families or individuals who wish to purchase their own coverage? Penn State University Extension’s Maureen Ittig, family well-being educator, and Ginger Fenton, dairy educator, recently presented a webinar where they shared the following suggestions:

Health Insurance Marketplace. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 created the federal Health Insurance Marketplace. Americans who do not have access to employer-sponsored health insurance can secure coverage through the marketplace, which provides credits for factors like income and family size. A handy calculator to estimate credits and plan costs can be found here . All ACA-compliant plans must cover 10 categories of services that includes things like prescriptions, pediatric care and emergency room services. Open enrollment for ACA plans is usually in the fall, but special circumstances can allow for enrollment throughout the year.
Medicaid/CHIP plans. Lower-income families may qualify for Medicaid and/or Children’s Health Insurance Program plans. These plans vary by state. They typically are less costly to families and may provide additional services, like dental and vision coverage, compared to ACA plans.
Association-based plans. Farm organizations and cooperatives may offer group plans to farmer-members. These organizations also offer guidance to help farm families understand the “language” of health insurance and aid in decision making.
HSAs. Using a Health Savings Account (HSA) is a popular way for farmers to maximize their health insurance dollars. HSAs are actual bank accounts that families fund annually and can be used to cover qualified health expenses. Any dollars not used can remain in the account for expenses incurred later on and even invested into higher-yielding financial funds. To access an HSA, the insured must have a High Deductible Health Plan, which can be accessed via insurance brokers, association-based plans, or the Health Insurance Marketplace. HSAs offer the “triple-treat” tax advantages of pre-tax contributions, tax-free growth and no tax on qualified withdrawals.
Skinny and gap plans. Some states allow for skinny plans that have lower premiums, largely because they are not required to offer the ACA-required 10 categories of services, like allowing entry with pre-existing conditions or maternity coverage. They also may have lifetime payout limits. Gap plans offer short-term, emergency coverage in some states. After 180 days, the insured must enroll for new coverage. They also may have exclusions and lifetime limits.
Armed forces health insurance. According to the 2022 Census of Agriculture, about 9% of U.S farmers are veterans. They and their families are usually eligible for TRICARE or Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health insurance programs.
Healthcare sharing ministries. Several faith-based group health coverage ministries are available that share healthcare costs among their members. This is not health insurance, but many users find they are able to negotiate rates with providers similar to discounts offered to insurance companies. Enrollment may require specific belief systems and lifestyle choices (no tobacco or illegal drug use, for example). Users pay monthly fees similar to health insurance premiums. When they incur an expense, they pay their bills up front and then submit them for reimbursement.

The Penn State experts advised looking not only at costs, but also at the services your family might need, such as maternity and mental health coverage.

“The array of options available hopefully will allow you to pick an option that works best for you, your budget and your values,” Fenton notes.

Your Next Read:
A Promising Horizon for U.S. Dairy

A Promising Horizon for U.S. Dairy

Tue, 27 May 2025 13:00:00 GMT

Editor’s Note: This is one article in a series that is included in the 2025 Farm Journal’s State of the Dairy Industry report. The full 16-page report will appear in the May/June issues of Dairy Herd Management and Milk Business Quarterly and will be published in this space over the next several weeks. To download the full report for free click here.
_______________________________________________________________________________________

Farm Journal’s State of the Dairy Industry 2025 report provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and outlook of the dairy industry. The report surveyed 400 dairy producers across the U.S., focusing on those with cow herds that exceed 100 cows. The survey aimed to understand producers’ future plans, the challenges they face and their overall sentiment toward the industry.

The results of the survey have revealed an air of optimism among dairy operators. The biggest takeaway was their increased confidence as compared to a year ago. Financial and attitudinal indicators suggest a positive trend, with producers generally anticipating more profits this year compared to last. Furthermore, there is an increased consensus among surveyed producers that they hold an optimistic view for the future of the industry. Many are confident about the milk market’s potential as well.

The Road Ahead

While the path forward is not without its challenges, it seems that the dairy industry is preparing to tackle these with a renewed sense of optimism. The sentiments captured in the survey indicate that operators are adapting and planning strategically for continued success.

This survey followed a similar format to that of the 2024 report, allowing for comparison and identification of trends over the past year. The purpose was to understand not only the current challenges but also the direction in which the industry is headed.

As the industry continues to navigate through its current challenges, producers continue to embrace innovative practices and unlock further opportunities for growth. There is a promising horizon ahead for the dairy industry, and if these trends continue, it could lead to a more sustainable and prosperous future.

Farm Journal’s State of the Dairy Industry 2025 report underscores the resilience and the adaptability of dairy producers, further strengthening the industry’s foundation for the years to come.

(Farm Journal)

An Incredible Bird's-Eye Look at the State of the Dairy Industry

Mon, 19 May 2025 13:19:06 GMT

Technology Integration

In an era where technology permeates nearly every aspect of life, the dairy industry stands at the forefront of this transformative wave. The integration of technology is no longer just an option; it has become a crucial step toward creating a more efficient and sustainable dairy industry. From feeding systems to health monitoring devices, technology helps dairy farmers optimize operations and ensure animal welfare.

A recent survey highlights a significant shift in the adoption of technology within the dairy sector. Remarkably, two-thirds of dairies now use at least one form of feeding technology. These innovations are designed to streamline the feeding process, providing precise nutrient delivery to livestock and reducing waste. The result is a noticeable improvement in both efficiency and sustainability.

Diversifying Revenue Streams

In today’s changing economic landscape, many dairy producers are finding innovative ways to sustain and grow their businesses. The key to survival during these turbulent times seems to be diversification.

Farm Journal’s recent survey reveals approximately one-quarter of dairy producers have embraced alternative land or dairy add-on revenue streams. This shift underscores the industry’s agility and adaptability as producers look for various avenues to boost profitability.

One strategy gaining traction is the beef-on-dairy operation. An impressive three-quarters of operators are now involved in at least one beef-on-dairy practice, with breeding and raising being the most common methods. Though there has been a decline in the number of producers raising animals under their beef-on-dairy operations over the past year, there is a notable increase in the sale of branded beef products. This shift highlights the evolving dynamics within the industry as producers adapt to market demands.

Next-Gen Transfers

A significant concern facing the industry today is the impending wave of retirements among dairy operators, many of whom have not established formal succession plans. This situation is becoming increasingly urgent, with surveys indicating that a quarter of these operators intend to retire within the next five years.

Contrary to the retirement trend, there is also a strong movement toward growth and expansion within the industry. Almost half of the operators express a desire to expand their operations in the near future. Such ambition suggests confidence in the industry’s potential and reflects a proactive approach to ensuring a sustainable future. At the same time, an equivalent number of operators are planning to maintain their current herd sizes, indicating a focus on maximizing efficiency and resource management.

Sustainability Program Awareness

Farm Journal’s recent survey reveals an array of insights regarding current sustainability practices and the prevailing awareness surrounding them. While the inclination toward adopting sustainable practices is reassuring, a deficiency in program awareness raises concerns that need to be addressed.

Encouragingly, over half of survey respondents (63%) reported participating in at least one sustainable practice. This trend is indicative of a growing societal shift toward environmental responsibility. Interestingly, larger operations, particularly those with substantial herd sizes and extensive acreage, tend to embrace sustainability more comprehensively. This trend is most pronounced in the Western region.

Reality of Workforce Shortages

A recent survey highlights the growing dependency of the dairy industry on non-family labor. For many respondents, non-family members consist of at least 50% of their workforce. This shift is indicative of broader changes within the industry as traditional family-run farms adapt to meet growing demands. However, hiring and retaining workers continues to be significant challenges. With evolving labor-related aspects indicating enduring challenges, the industry must explore viable solutions to continue thriving.

Despite the adoption of new technologies, the challenges of hiring and retaining a reliable workforce remain. Farmers must continue to balance the integration of technology with human labor, ensuring that both aspects work in harmony to drive growth and productivity. These changes suggest a long-term shift in how labor is approached, maintaining traditional farming values while embracing modern advancements.

Optimistic Horizon

The dairy sector is witnessing renewed confidence, energized by innovative strategies and fueled by a younger generation of forward-thinking dairy operators ready to embrace change. Their willingness to adopt advanced technologies and improved herd management techniques is reshaping the landscape of dairy farming. By integrating strategic solutions, these operators are setting a new standard that promises to uplift the entire industry.

According to surveys, 44% of producers plan to expand their operations in the next five years. This drive to scale indicates a strong belief in the trajectory of the dairy industry and its ability to thrive amid changing global dynamics.

The 2025 Farm Journal State of the Dairy Industry Report is available for download here .

Replacement Heifer Prices Hang in Record Territory

Mon, 07 Apr 2025 21:47:09 GMT

It’s history in the making in U.S. dairy animal trade right now, as springer values stay knocking on the door of $4,000 per head, and calf prices continue to soar. Newborn beef-cross calves are bringing north of $1,000 per head nationwide. Ironically, those calves also are at least partially the source of climbing heifer values. In the January 2025 USDA Cattle Report , lactating dairy cows showed an annual tally of about 9.5 million head, up about 3,000 head from the previous year. But the count of dairy heifers 500 pounds and over fell nearly 40,000 head as dairy producers continue to reach for beef semen to raise high-in-demand crossbred calves. That demand is fueled by a dwindling U.S. beef cow herd, which the same report noted was the smallest in 64 years.

Heifer Prices

(Maureen Hanson)

Staph. aureus is being Confirmed More Frequently as the Culprit Contributing to Subclinical Mastitis

Mon, 07 Apr 2025 20:39:38 GMT

If you look hard enough, you can find Staphylococcus aureus (Staph aureus) in at least one cow on every dairy, according to Dr. Justine Britten a PhD animal scientist working at Udder Health Systems Inc .

Despite that bold statement, Britten is not implying every dairy has a mastitis problem or is gearing up for an outbreak. Rather, she is pointing out how common the pathogen is on the farm and that it often flies under the radar, contributing most frequently to subclinical disease.

“One thing I’m still surprised about, is I think that most producers, veterinarians, and consultants know that, and they don’t necessarily,” she tells Dr. Fred Gingrich, Executive Director for the American Association of Bovine Practitioners, during a recent “Have You Herd” podcast: Managing Staph aureus Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Britten says that the prevalence of Staph aureus is increasing, based on the 7,800 bulk milk samples her company tests, on average, each year. From 2017 to 2021, the prevalence stayed relatively flat at about 20%. Today, the prevalence is more than double that.

“We’re seeing it now at around 44% to 45% of all bulk tank samples we do are positive for Staph aureus,” she says.

Consider The Heifer Population

Something Britten says has surprised her is that heifers may calve into a subclinical infection, resulting from Staph aureus, even in a closed herd.

“Being a closed herd will help reduce the chances that’s going to happen, but it’s still possible,” she says.

In evaluating literature, Britten says between 2% and 15% of heifers are going to calve in with it, and they may have a clinical episode. However, cell counts in the infected heifers tend to be low which lessens detection.

“That’s one of the most frustrating things, is that positive heifers may stay around 100,000 or less with their cell count for quite a while before it begins to climb, and that makes it really difficult for producers to get their minds around the fact that this animal is permanently infected with a contagious pathogen. It also makes the disease that much more difficult to manage,” she says.

If the dairy is not proactively screening, heifers typically recover from an episode and look fine. At that point, they are usually returned to the herd where they may infect other heifers and cows.

“My takeaway is if Staph aureus was easier to see, more like a mycoplasma, I suspect producers would be a lot less tolerant of it than they currently are,” she says.

Screen All Cows And Heifers

Britten considers a monthly bulk tank culture as the bare minimum that a dairy can do towards monitoring pathogens in the bulk tank, and she calls it an incredibly helpful tool.

“You’re really operating in a vacuum otherwise,” she says. “Even by monitoring at the bulk tank level, we’re monitoring at the 10,000-foot view. But if [the dairy] is not doing any other culturing, it’s still better than nothing.”

Britten says she is a strong advocate for screening all cows and heifers as that’s the most proactive approach to prevention.

“It works, I know that it works, but it is very important to have some kind of audit system in place, so that you get them all, not 50% of them, not 70% of them, all of them, and that you have a management plan in place for what to do with them,” she says.

On the dairies she works with that have a very low staff positivity rate, they often sell the cows.

“They’re not going to tolerate them, while for others it’s too expensive to do that,” she says. “They’re going to go into a staff pen, or with the heifers, they try and treat them and see if we can get them cleared up. But yeah, screening, culturing of all fresh cows and heifers is the best way to find those animals early and to manage them.”

Take-Home Messages

In the podcast, Gingrich and Britten discuss that in outbreak situations it is important to evaluate why cows are getting infected and remember that cows typically get infected in the parlor and focus efforts there. This includes evaluating teat condition, parlor procedures and equipment function.

Aggressive culturing programs, segregation and culling are important to minimize risk.

Britten provides these three additional take-home points, per the AABP discussion:

Take-home point #1 – Not all Staph aureus colonies exhibit beta-hemolysis, therefore, it is important that all Staph colonies undergo coagulase testing to identify Staph aureus.

Take-home point #2 – Monthly bulk tank cultures are a bare minimum monitoring program for dairy farms.

Take-home point #3 – Somatic cell count is a lagging indicator and cultures will detect infections earlier. Britten emphasized that the difference lies in management practices. Proactive monitoring, culturing, and implementing strict control measures can prevent Staph aureus from becoming a major issue, even though the pathogen is present.

For more information and recommendations, be sure to check out the podcast: Managing Staph aureus Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Managing Heifer Inventories to Maintain Herd Size

Thu, 03 Apr 2025 15:00:00 GMT

Market costs for replacements are at an all-time high, ranging between $3,000 and $4,000 per head. Iowa State University Extension calculated heifer raising costs in 2024 to be just over $2,600 for 24 months. The difference in the expenses provides a financial opportunity for dairy farms that can raise their own replacements. Heifer inventories need to ensure that herd size is maintained. The amount of heifers needed on the dairy to maintain herd size is highly impacted by age at first calving and herd culling rates.

Age at First Calving

Heifers are unique to the farm in that they are the future of the dairy farm but do not provide income to the farm until they have their first calf. The optimal first calving age ranges between 22 and 24 months. According to Iowa State estimates, reducing the age at first calving by a month will save the dairy $93 per heifer. However, research has shown that calving too early (< 21 months) would hurt profitability in the long run because heifers would not reach their full milk production potential.

Proper growth rates are extremely important to reach optimal age at first calving. Body weight determines when heifers reach puberty, around 45 to 50% of mature weight. Too low of average daily gain can delay puberty, which then will have a snowball effect by delaying time to first breeding and age at first calving.

Delaying the age at first calving costs money and increases the heifer inventory needed to maintain herd size. A herd of 100 milking cows needs 5 to 6 more additional heifers for every two-month increase of age at first calving when their culling rate is 30%.

Culling Rate

To no surprise, the rate at which animals leave the herd has a significant impact on the replacement inventory. A herd of 100 milking cows with an age of first calving of 24 months needs an additional 4 to 5 heifers with every 2% increase in culling rate. Therefore, increasing the culling rate from 22% to 32% would require 22 additional heifers to keep the milking herd size at 100.

High market prices for heifers can significantly increase farm income for farms with excessive replacements. However, heifer inventories should be monitored closely. Small changes in culling rate and age at first calving significantly impact the number of replacements needed.

Your Next Read: The 5 Big Market Trends Dairy Farmers Need to Keep Their Eye on this Year

The Bright Future of the U.S. Dairy Industry: Innovations and Opportunities

Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:44:47 GMT

The U.S. dairy industry is witnessing a significant upswing, showcasing its potential for growth and innovation. Gregg Doud, president and CEO of the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), shared insights at the 2025 California Dairy Sustainability Conference held in Visalia, Calif. His address highlighted the resurgence of animal fats in the diet and the promising future of dairy products, including fluid milk.

Dairy’s Time to Shine
Doud emphasized the renewed interest in animal fats and noted that it’s now dairy’s moment to take the spotlight. With $8.5 billion invested in processing pipelines and new investments, such as Chobani’s recent $500 million expansion in its Twin Falls yogurt facility, the dairy industry is capturing attention. Doud challenged the audience by asking, “Where else in agriculture in the world, name another commodity in another country that has this kind of investment that’s going on in the dairy industry in the United States today?” Answering his question, he confidently stated, “The answer is nowhere.”

Emerging Opportunities and Investments
The massive $8.5 billion is spread across 17 facilities throughout the U.S., fueling the industry’s expansion. Doud pointed out the potential for growth in protein demand not just domestically but also globally. The Midwest stands as a primary area for expanding animal protein crush. Highlighting milestones, he mentioned Hilmar’s new cheese-producing facility in Dodge City, Kan.

“The Midwest, these are the only places on Earth that we can expand in terms of animal protein crush today,” Doud says. “Draw a circle with a 300-mile radius around Amarillo, Texas. Dodge City, Kan., last week, we just had the ribbon cutting — an enormous cheese producing facility.”

U.S. Dairy Exports on the Rise
The export value of U.S. dairy products has seen substantial growth year over year (YOY), rising 20% to an impressive $714 million — a January record. The relationship with Mexico as the top U.S. cheese customer continues to strengthen, although January exports recorded a modest 1% increase.

“The cheese exports to Mexico,” Doud enthusiastically remarked. “This is where it’s at, folks. This is why I’m so excited about this industry.”

China’s post-COVID-19 recovery shows a slower tempo, with Doud pointing out that just 300 million of China’s 1.4 billion people are driving dairy demand. He noted some challenges, such as China’s low semen import rates and the impact of high U.S. interest rates on global competition, but remained hopeful that changes in these areas could present future opportunities.

“That’s a leading indicator to say things are not going to go as well in China, no production going forward, maybe there is going to be some opportunity thereafter,” he says, noting that when you have high interest rates in the U.S. that makes the dollar strong, it makes it difficult to compete globally. “Our exports have been a little softer, but we’re still exporting about 16% of our production.”

Trade Imbalances and a Shift in Production
Another critical point Doud highlighted was the trade imbalance between the U.S. and the European Union (EU). Currently, the U.S. imports $3 billion in dairy products from the EU while exporting just $167 million. This imbalance underlines a broader narrative that sees U.S. dairy exports to non-traditional markets, like Guatemala, outpacing exports to the EU.

“It is an outrageous imbalance and trade,” he says. “You realize that we actually export 15 times more cheese to Guatemala than we do the European Union.”

Interestingly, while milk production appears stagnant, the shift in focus to producing more solids is changing the landscape of the industry.

“We have changed this industry,” Doud stated. “This is why we make more cheese because we’ve got more solids.”

The U.S. dairy industry, driven by substantial investments and shifting consumer preferences, is poised for significant growth in the coming years. As the dairy industry adapts to new challenges and opportunities, stakeholders and consumers alike can look forward to an era where dairy continues to thrive and innovate on a global scale.

Your Next Read:
Water Woes, Labor Limitations and Regulatory Restrictions Put California’s Dairy Industry At A Crossroads

Economists Fear the U.S. Will See a Recession in 2025, And That Could Eat Into Consumers' Demand for Meat

Fri, 28 Mar 2025 17:56:25 GMT

Consumer meat sales hit record-breaking levels last year. The craze for protein-filled diets has been a storyline that’s helped drive meat demand, which is good news for meat producers. Ag economists warn, however, the major limiting factor for meat demand, and meat prices, in 2025 just may be what happens in the overall economy.

The March Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor asked economists if they think the U.S. general economy will see a recession in 2025, and 62% said yes.

Recent reports agree with that sentiment, as the Federal Reserve’s key inflation index rose more than expected in February and consumer spending posted a smaller-than-projected increase, according to the Commerce Department. Both could be warning signs of what’s ahead.

As a follow up question, The Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor survey asked, “In what ways does the U.S. economy impact meat demand in 2025?” Respondents had no shortage of opinions on that.

Here’s a rundown of some of their reactions:

“If real wages fall, there will be a substitution toward other protein/cheaper meat cuts.”
“Slower growth (even if the U.S. does not endure a recession) will reduce consumer willingness to spend, especially at a time when beef prices, in particular, are high.”
“A downturn in economic growth impacts disposable income and should slow animal protein demand.”
“There is a positive correlation between GDP and meat demand, particularly between GDP and higher end cuts.”
“When the U.S. economy is strong and incomes increase, consumers have more disposable income to spend on meat and higher quality cuts of meat. When the U.S. economy is weak and disposable income tightens, consumers may reduce meat in their diet or turn to less expensive meat options.”

Not all economists expect U.S. consumer demand to fall off though, even if the U.S. officially enters into a recession.

“Labor income is growing faster than inflation. Most U.S. firms are profitable - at least as of current earnings reports,” said one economist.

Another shared, “I do think consumer demand will be lower in 2025 than it was in 2024. That being said - 2024 consumer expenditures and demand were a lot higher than I anticipated at the beginning of the year. Two indicators that are showing up, and are unsustainable right now, are reducing savings accounts and increasing credit card debt. I think it leads to slower meat demand in 2025, partially due to lower meat availability and partially due to slowing consumer demand. Notice I said ‘slowing’ consumer demand and not ‘declining/negative’. Demand does not have to decline year-over-year to impact meat prices. Slowing can do the same thing.”

The GLP-1 Effect
What could have an even bigger impact on meat demand, and even more so than inflation and a recession, is the use of GLP-1 drugs for weight loss. GLP-1 drugs not only moderate users’ blood sugar levels, but also affect their appetites by suppressing hunger cravings.

“U.S. consumer preference for meat demand is strong, though I would be paying attention to the growing use of GLP-1s as it relates to all agricultural product demand,” one economist responded.

The good news is studies have shown those who use GLP-1 drugs often crave healthier items and often consume more protein versus unhealthy foods.

Starting From a Place of Strength
Forecasting meat demand in 2025 relies on a number of factors. But a positive trend is how consumers, especially the millennial generation, are buying more meat. As PorkBusiness.com reported this week, consumers are buying more meat than ever. In 2024, meat sales hit a record high of $104.6 billion and total pounds sold increased by 2.3%, which was cited in the latest Power of Meat.

More people want meat today, but economists are concerned any economic pain could eat into overall meat demand.

More Funding Going to Tackle HPAI H5N1, Egg Imports are Now Underway to Stabilize Supply

Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:35:10 GMT

On Thursday morning, USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins gave an update on progress the Trump administration is making on the five-prong strategy it unveiled Feb. 26 to combat avian influenza virus type A (H5N1).

Speaking to industry stakeholders, media and offices of elected officials, Rollins focused on the administration’s work to lower egg prices and improve supply, while also emphasizing the importance of biosecurity in protecting U.S. poultry flocks from the virus.

Regarding egg prices, she said wholesale prices are down nearly 50% from their peak in late February from $8.53 then to $4.08 currently.

However, Rollins said she realizes that wholesale prices don’t automatically show up as reductions in retail prices.

“I know for some of us who are shopping that we’ve seen egg prices drop immediately, which has been true for me. But then we’ll hear from people in other parts of the country where they have yet to see that reduction on their grocery store shelf.”

With Easter just a few weeks away, she acknowledged that egg demand is always “unusually high during the season,” and that egg prices could potentially move back up.

To help address the egg shortage, Rollins noted that shell egg exports have declined by 8%, “keeping more eggs in the U.S. and lowering prices.”

In addition, the Trump administration is allowing egg imports as a temporary measure to stabilize prices and supply. Rollins’ chief of staff Kailee Buller said this measure would likely be discontinued once those measures were achieved.

USDA Focuses On Biosecurity For Poultry Operations
Rollins said biosecurity in poultry flocks will continue to be a major part of the Trump administration’s plan to address H5N1, moving forward.

“Our pilot programs have proven that biosecurity is the most important thing our farmers can do to protect our flocks against the disease, at least right now,” she said.

The USDA is working closely, she said, with its federal partners including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Centers for Disease Control (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to “combat avian flu as a unified federal family.”

On Wednesday, USDA announced it is expanding the availability of its biosecurity assessments to commercial poultry producers.

“These assessments, which were previously available on a limited basis have been extremely successful in improving biosecurity on individual premises and preventing the introduction or spread of avian influenza,” Rollins said.

While USDA is exploring the viability of vaccinating poultry for H5N1, she said the use of any vaccine for poultry or any animal species has not been authorized at this time.

“I know there has been some misreporting on that,” Rollins said. “The day we rolled out the plan, I actually talked about the fact that we’re not ready to vaccinate. We need to do some more research, and so that has not changed, but I do look forward to this next process of learning more about getting more research done and perhaps seeing what makes sense for the country moving forward, once that is concluded.”

Dairy Is Not Part Of USDA’s Primary H5N1 Focus
No information was offered during the conference call to address the issue of H5N1 in dairy cattle or other livestock or animal species.

Mike Watson, administrator of USDA-APHIS, said right now USDA is focused on the poultry vaccine.

“We’re looking for a vaccine that has sterilizing immunity but also an opportunity for us to have different introduction methods for the vaccine right now, as injections are the only possibility,” he said. “We need new tools, whether it’s water based, aerosol based, those kind of things. We’re looking for manufacturers to really look at what those options might be, to really provide us with a vaccine that matches the current strain but also is highly effective. And again, this is really focused on poultry.”

Buller said there is already quite a bit of research at USDA on the topic in dairy.

“Please rest assured, we are thinking of you all (in dairy). We know you all are impacted. But for this particular strategy, we have been hyper-focused on the poultry side. USDA has separate work streams as we’re working through this on the cattle and dairy side.”

One of the media asked whether Sec. Rollins had talked further with HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. regarding his idea of letting H5N1 burn through poultry flocks to identify birds that might have immunity or show resistance to the virus.

Buller answered the question, as Rollins had stepped away from the call. “I have not been engaged specifically with those conversations with the Secretary and Secretary Kennedy,” she said. “They are talking very regularly and you are aligned on the approach, but in terms of that specific topic, there’s no further light I can shed on that at this time.”

Assessments Available To Poultry Operations
USDA is offering two different, free, voluntary biosecurity assessments for poultry operations not currently affected by HPAI.

The first is a wildlife biosecurity assessment. The second is a general biosecurity assessment. Poultry producers can request one or both of these free assessments.

Per the wildlife biosecurity assessment, Rollins said USDA will conduct on-farm assessments at poultry facilities and provide recommendations to producers for facility repairs and wildlife management techniques. The assessments include a series of regular engagements, including wildlife hazard identification surveys, wildlife abundance surveys and wildlife management on the premises.

“USDA has assessed approximately 130 facilities to date (in 2025), and plans on doing significantly more moving forward and expanding that program,” she said.

For the general biosecurity assessment, USDA will work with poultry producers to review biosecurity plans and physical measures.

“This is a proactive resource for premises that are outside of avian flu control areas to identify and mitigate potential biosecurity gaps,” she said.

Funding Is Ramped Up To Address HPAI In Poultry
The USDA announced on Thursday that up to $100 million in funding will be available to support projects on avian influenza, prevention, therapeutics, vaccines and research.

“USDA will invest up to $100 million in these projects, which will identify and foster innovative solutions to fight avian flu and directly support American producers,” Rollins said during the conference call.

Funding is available through a competitive process to for-profit organizations, including manufacturers of vaccines, biologics and therapeutics, as well as states, universities, livestock producer organizations and other eligible entities, she noted.

USDA will prioritize one or more of the following. First, it will support the development of novel therapeutics to address HPAI in poultry. Second, it will support research to further understand the risk pathways of avian influenza for producers and to inform improved biosecurity and response strategies.

“Let me just say, as a quick aside, I’ve had multiples and multiples and multiples of conversations with some of our chicken farmers across the country —many of them have been highly successful at not having the bird flu infect their populations,” Rollins said. “Better understanding of risk pathways and realizing what best practices are is a big part of (this work).”

The third focus is on the development of novel vaccines to protect poultry from H5N1 while promoting biosecurity.

“That will all be part of the research funding opportunity that we announced about an hour and a half ago,” Rollins said.

USDA will test the efficacy of therapeutic interventions to prevent the virus and treat infected flocks.

“USDA, in consultation with HHS, has already had multiple conversations with Secretary Kennedy and leaders in the NIH and CDC, but will also be exploring prevention strategies to promote biosecurity in agriculture and in humans, to ensure limited impact on American farmers,” Rollins noted.

USDA is offering a webinar to assist interested applicants in learning more about the funding opportunity and how to submit a proposal on Tuesday, April 1 at 12 p.m. Eastern. No details on how to participate in the webinar have been communicated yet.

“As we try to do everything under this president and here at USDA, we will be as fast and efficient and effective as we can possibly be, working around the clock,” Rollins said.

Buller added that Sec. Rollins and her staff will continue to host update calls regularly.

“It’s very important to Sec. Rollins that we are showing progress on this five-prong plan and being honest and open with the public about what we’re up to and the progress and potential challenges that we have ahead,” Buller said. “We have an open door here, and we remain open to having conversations and hearing from stakeholders.”

Calf Milk Poses H5N1 Risk, Too

Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:11:23 GMT

Soon after the discovery of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) strain H5N1 in dairy cattle, scientists learned that milk was a primary vector in spreading the disease from cow to cow.

But what happens when waste milk from the sick cows is fed to other animals? Early in the disease outbreak, domestic cats consuming raw milk from infected cows began dying. This prompted researchers at the USDA National Animal Disease Center in Ames, Iowa to conduct a study on the potential of passing H5N1 to preweaned calves via unpasteurized waste milk.

Four Holstein calves ranging from 7-11 weeks of age were fed approximately 1 quart of unpasteurized waste milk from experimentally inoculated cows twice a day for 4 days. One additional calf served as a control, and was fed milk from HPAI-free cows in the same experiment period.

Calves fed infected milk showed signs of illness that included nasal discharge, mild fever, mild lethargy, loose stools, and slightly increased respiratory effort for 5-6 days. The researchers noted that all symptoms were mild and may not be readily recognized in an on-farm setting with other environmental or health stressors.

Transmission of the H5N1 virus to the 4 calves fed infected milk was confirmed via nasal swabs collected 2-4 days after the feedings. Within 2 weeks after the experimental feeding trial, all calves in the study were humanely euthanized. Presence of the virus was further confirmed via tissue samples from lung lesions, lymph nodes, and tonsils from the 4 calves receiving infected milk.

The USDA researchers said the study underscored the importance of pasteurizing waste milk fed to calves, as pasteurization has been proven to kill the virus. This is especially crucial because research on infected herds has shown that cows begin shedding the virus in their milk up to 2 weeks before they start to show clinical signs of illness.

Meanwhile, researchers at the University of California-Davis have investigated a practical alternative to pasteurization of waste milk: acidification. In a study recently published in the Journal of Dairy Science , they noted that fewer than 50% of large dairy farms routinely pasteurize waste milk fed to calves.

They found that in a laboratory setting, acidification of waste milk with citric acid to a pH of 4.1-4.2 effectively deactivated the H5N1 virus. The acidification process takes only 6 hours and does not require refrigeration.

The UC-Davis researchers posed that acidification can be a practical, affordable, accessible method of preventing the spread of H5N1 to calves in operations that do not have pasteurization systems for waste milk.

Calves will be a critical control point in navigating H5N1 in the U.S. dairy industry. The USDA researchers noted that 1 out of every 10 dairy operations in the country raise their heifers off site, and most veal and beef-cross calves are transported to another facility for raising.

Protecting those calves from H5N1 will be a crucial element in preventing spread of the disease.

Your Next Read:
How Often Does the Real Ration Hit the Bunk?

A Resilient Comeback: U.S. Bovine Semen Industry Sees Growth in 2024

Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:12:06 GMT

After two years of declining sales, the bovine semen industry is experiencing a remarkable resurgence. Reports from both the dairy and beef semen sectors indicate increased sales in 2024, showing a promising trend that might not only match but potentially surpass the record levels seen in 2021. Jay Weiker, President of the National Association of Animal Breeders (NAAB), emphasizes the optimistic outlook for the industry, suggesting that if the current growth trajectory persists, new record sales could be on the horizon.

“Unit sales have not yet returned to the record levels of 2021. However, if the current trajectory continues, new records can be expected in the near future,” Weiker says.

In 2024, total unit sales increased by 4%, culminating in nearly 69 million units. This 2.7 million unit increase nearly compensates for the previous year’s decline. Moreover, the value of exported semen rose by over 6%, or roughly $20 million, establishing a new record of $326 million.

Dairy and Beef Segment Breakdown
The dairy sector, both in domestic sales and exports, saw a significant 4% growth compared to 2023. This equates to an additional 1.9 million units, summing up to 48.8 million units. Meanwhile, beef unit sales also increased by 4%, with over 850,000 additional units sold, reaching a total of 20 million units. Delving deeper, beef-on-dairy semen sales grew by about 317,000 units both in the U.S. and internationally, while beef-on-beef sales saw an increase of 408,000 units, reversing the decreasing trend of the past two years.

Global Adjustments and Shifts
Globally, dairy producers are recalibrating their reproductive strategies to maximize economic returns. They are now employing a mix of conventional, gender-selected dairy and beef semen to enhance their financial performance. In the U.S., this trend is visible in the shifting preferences for semen types. In 2024, gender-selected dairy semen led the pack with 9.9 million units, marking a 1.5 million unit increase.

The Rise of Heterospermic Semen
An intriguing development in 2024 is the surge in heterospermic beef product sales. Over 2.8 million units were sold, more than twice the numbers from 2023. Domestic sales dominated with 2.4 million units, making heterospermic beef the second largest beef semen category after Angus.

Domestic Market Dynamics
In the domestic market, dairy units increased by 5%, adding nearly 705,000 units, with the total market size reaching 16.2 million dairy units. The domestic beef units saw an overall increase of 304,000 units. The most notable domestic shift was towards gender-selected semen, rising by 1.5 million units or 18% and now comprising 61% of the dairy units used in the U.S.

Robust Global Demand
On the international front, U.S. bovine semen exports continue their upward trajectory despite economic and geopolitical challenges in major markets like China and Russia. Encouraging signs of recovery in Brazil, growth in Western Europe and Central Asia, and expanding opportunities in the Middle East and Africa reflect the global strength of the industry. Beef semen exports rose significantly and according to Dr. Sophie Eaglen, NAAB’s International Program Director, this stems from the increased demand from Brazil and China, alongside a growing number of smaller markets.

“This trend may be attributed to the global adoption of the beef-on-dairy strategy, which is gaining traction across diverse regions” Eaglen says.

The U.S. bovine semen industry has made a strong comeback in 2024. With positive trends in both domestic and international sales and the growing acceptance of innovative breeding strategies, the foundation is laid for future growth and advancements in livestock reproduction. As these trends continue, the industry stands on the verge of a promising era characterized by growth, innovation, and global expansion.

Your Next Read:
From Traditional to Technological: The Evolution of Rolinda Acres

U.S. Dollar Sees Worst Weekly Drop Since 1995

Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:52:10 GMT

After a week of trade war headlines, dairy markets started the week on a quiet note. What little action there was showed buyers willing to own NDM and cheese at these levels. Class III futures opened around a dime down with fears that last week’s headlines may continue. Last week, the U.S. dollar had the worst week-to-week performance since 1995 and that, combined with global dairy price premiums, should spark some export interest and support domestic prices.

Today’s Highlights from Ever.Ag’s Know Your Markets

CME barrels dropped another 2.5 cents today, settling at $1.6050 per pound, the lowest price since December. Spot blocks gained some ground, rising to $1.6325, a penny gain. Five lots of blocks and one of barrels traded. The only other movement was in spot NDM, which ticked up a quarter cent to $1.1575 per pound, with three loads exchanged.

Dairy futures didn’t see any major drops or increases today. Second quarter Class III declined to $17.37 per hundredweight, down a nickel to the life-of-contract low set last Thursday.

Tomorrow brings USDA’s March World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates report. Analysts are predicting a small decrease in world corn ending stocks and a slight increase for soybeans. Ahead of that report, nearby corn futures lifted 3.5 cents to $4.5875 per bushel, while soybeans dropped to $9.9975, a 10.5-cent loss.

Ever.Ag - The risk of loss trading commodity futures and options can be substantial. Investors should carefully consider the inherent risks in light of their financial condition. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources to be reliable, however, no independent verification has been made. The information contained herein is strictly the opinion of its author and not necessarily of Ever.Ag and is intended to be a solicitation. Past performance is not indicative of future results.